Trusted Criminal Defense Attorneys In Southern California
I agree to receive promotional content and notifications from Manshoory Law Group through email or text message. For further details, kindly refer to our Privacy Policy.
In criminal law, this defense holds true when someone acts under a false but reasonable belief, therefore influencing their mens rea¹. Whether the accused had the necessary intent to participate in illegal activity takes the front stage. Should the erroneous notion eliminate intent, a conviction could be denied. It is not like a Mistake of Law, though, since courts hardly consider ignorance of the law as a legitimate justification. Analyzing legal tactics in criminal cases depends on an awareness of this difference.
Explaining the Mistake of Fact Defense
Whether someone has criminal intent depends on their act occurring under an erroneous but reasonable assumption regarding a critical fact. This defense of error is applied in circumstances whereby the accused did not deliberatelycommit a crime.
For example, taking another person’s jacket by mistake while thinking it belongs to you lacks the intention of theft. Still, deliberately grabbing it even knowing it belongs to someone else is not allowed.
This case is more successful where conviction depends on establishing intention. When intent to act alone is enough for guilt, its effectiveness is limited. Some offenses do not allow this defense at all, as intent is not required for conviction.
The Role of the Mistake of Fact in Criminal Liability
In criminal law, the mental state² determineswhether an act was intentional or accidental. Many crimes call for proof of purpose, and this defense might refute that by demonstrating the accused lacks understanding of misconduct.
Taking an item while believing it belongs to you differs from knowingly stealing it. One involves an honest mistake, while the other demonstrates criminal intent.
Courts carefully assess fact or law distinctions³. A Mistake of Factcan excuse a crime by negating intent, but a Mistake of Law—claiming ignorance of the law—is rarely accepted. The key difference is whether the misunderstanding affects the ability to form criminal intent.
What is the Mistake of Law Defense?
This defense applies when a person commits a crime due to ignorance or misunderstanding of legal rules. Unlike other defenses that question intent, it argues that the defendant did not realize their actions were illegal.
Courts rarely accept this argument because individuals are expected to know the law. Not realizing that gambling is illegal in a certain state does not exempt someone from penalties. However, in rare cases, it may apply, such as when a government official provides incorrect legal advice that leads to unlawful actions.
In certain legal disputes, mistakes of law defensesare sometimes raised, but generally face strict limitations. Courts often require that the misunderstanding stem from official misinformation rather than personal ignorance of the law.
Do These Defenses Apply to Strict Liability Crimes?
Certain crimes do not require proof of intent; committing the act alone is enough for conviction. These offenses include statutory rape, selling alcohol to minors, and certain environmental violations.
Because mistake-of-fact defenses rely on negating intent, they are usually ineffective in these cases. A store owner who mistakenly sells alcohol to a minor using a fake ID⁴ is still liable—even if they genuinely believed the buyer was of legal age. Strict liability⁵ laws prioritize public safety over individual misunderstandings, making intent irrelevant in most cases.
Criteria for a Valid Mistake of Fact Defense
For this defense to be valid, the mistake must be both reasonable and bona fide (made in good faith). Courts consider whether a typical person in the same situation would have made the same honest mistake and whether it negates criminal intent.
A key factor is the type of crime involved. In specific intent crimes, where proving intent is necessary (e.g., theft or fraud), a mistake of fact can be a strong defense. If someone took another’s property genuinely believing it was theirs, they lacked the required intent for theft⁶.
However, in general intent crimes, where only the intent to act matters (e.g., assault), this defense is harder to use. Mistakenly striking another person under the belief they were an attacker may still lead to guilt, as the intent to strike existed, even if the reasoning was flawed.
Limitations and Challenges of the Mistake of Fact Defense
This defense does not apply when the misunderstanding is unreasonable or irrelevant to the crime. If a defendant’s belief was irrational or negligent, such as assuming an unlocked car was theirs without verifying ownership, the argument is unlikely to succeed.
One major challenge is proving that the mistake was reasonable and made in good faith. The prosecution may argue that the accused should have verified the facts before acting. Courts assess whether a reasonable person would have made the same error under similar circumstances.
Additionally, societal and legal perceptions influence how judges and juries interpret legal defenses in criminal cases. A mistaken belief that aligns with common sense is more likely to be accepted than one that appears reckless. This makes it critical for defendants to present strong evidence supporting their claims.
This defense plays a crucial role in cases where intent matters but comes with strict legal limitations. Successfully arguing it requires proving a reasonable and good-faith belief. However, courts carefully evaluate the circumstances, and a weak argument can lead to conviction.
Legal representation is essential in navigating a defense in criminal law cases. Our criminal defense attorneys at Manshoory Law can assess whether a defense of a mistake is applicable and build a strong case. Without proper legal guidance, defendants risk misinterpreting the law and facing severe penalties.
Consult a qualified lawyer today to build the strongest defense and secure the best possible outcome.
Many people search for the term “What is Bail Jumping?” but often struggle to find clear answers. To clarify, bail jumping is a serious legal issue defined as the failure of a defendant, who has been released on bail, to appear in court for a scheduled trial. In California, this act is treated with utmost seriousness and can lead to severe consequences that negatively impact the defendant’s legal status and may result in significant financial liabilities.
Understanding Bail in California
Bail consists[1] of money paid with the promise from the defendant that they will attend their trial. In this context, it permits accused persons to be out of remand while waiting for their hearing, and this helps in reducing their intrusions into their lives. In California, specifics of the amount of bail[2] are calculated in accordance with the type of crime, criminal record, and likelihood of a defendant’s escape.
How is Bail Determined?
Judges in California consider various elements when setting bail amounts. These include:
When a defendant is released on bail, they must adhere to specific conditions imposed by the court. These may include regular check-ins with a bail bondsman, restrictions on travel, and mandatory appearances at all scheduled court dates. Understanding these responsibilities is crucial; failure to comply can lead to bail jumping charges.
What is Bail Jumping?
Popularly known, it is legally classified under California Penal Code 1320 & 1320.5[4] and commonly referred to as failure to appear for court or simply skipping bail. This act is different from other related crimes, including violation of probation[5], refusal to observe a bailing condition, or being absent from a court hearing due to some circumstances beyond your control.
The Consequences of Failure to Appear in California
The closest consequence for any defendant who fails to appear in court is the bench warrant[6], issued for arrest. This warrant permits the arrest of the person without any delay in a civil matter.
If an offender continuously fails to respect the provisions of his bail, the consequences following the charge of bail jumping are very serious and long-lasting. It distorts the ongoing criminal trials and may also attract other charges that carry more severe consequences than others. Failure to appear can also impact a future legal situation in a way that a longer jail term or higher fines can be imposed.
Along with criminal charges of up to 4 years imprisonment and fines of up to $10,000 in instances where charges are felony[7], defendants who jump bail lose any properties or valuable items pledged to a bail bondsman. This loss is really felt and may impose a lot of stress not only on the defendant but also on his/her family members and relatives who may have guaranteed the amount paid for bail.
Legal Obligations and Rights After Missing a Court Date
If a defendant fails to appear in court, it is critical that they take immediate action. The first step should be reaching out to their attorney or legal counsel for guidance on how to rectify the situation before further legal action is initiated.
Surrender Voluntarily: If feasible, surrender voluntarily to law enforcement or the court.
File for Reinstatement: Work with your attorney to file necessary motions for reinstating bail[8]or rescheduling.
Legal counsel plays an essential role in managing these circumstances by advising defendants on potential defenses against bail jumping charges and assisting in rescheduling missed court dates.
Bail Jumping vs. Accidental Failure to Appear
It is essential to differentiate between willful bail jumping and unintentional failure to appear. Accidental failures may arise from circumstances beyond one’s control, such as medical emergencies, transportation issues or lack of proper notice regarding the court date, and can sometimes serve as valid defenses againstbail jumpingcharges. Understanding these distinctions can help defendants prepare an appropriate defense if charged with bail jumping.
The Process of Reinstating Bail or Rescheduling a Missed Court Appearance
To reinstate bail or reschedule a missed appearance, defendants should follow these steps:
Consult Your Attorney: Seek guidance from an experienced criminal defense attorney.
Surrender Voluntarily: If possible, voluntarily turn yourself in to law enforcement.
File Necessary Motions: Work with your attorney to file motions for reinstating your bail or obtaining a new court date.
Attend Rescheduled Hearing: Ensure attendance at any new court dates set by the judge.
By taking these steps promptly, defendants can mitigate some of the negative consequences associated with failing to appear.
Bail jumping is a major problem in California’s criminal justice system. By having some background information on what entails bail jumping, the consequences faced, and ways of dealing with the situation in case of missing court sessions, the defendant will be in a better position. If you or somebody dear to you has problems associated with bail jumping or has missed a court appearance, it is crucial to address this problem with qualified defense attorneys and legal aid that will help to solve it specifically.
If you need additional help or want to speak to an attorney about bail jumping or other matters, please contact us or call (877) 830-2348. Your rights deserve protection; let us help you navigate your path forward.
References
Manshoory Law Group, APC. (2022, January 19). How the bail system works in California | Manshoory Law. https://manshoorylaw.com/bail/
Manshoory Law Group, APC. (2021, December 6). Los Angeles Warrant Lawyer | Bench and Arrest Warrants Attorney | Manshoory Law. https://manshoorylaw.com/warrants/
The criminal justice system tackles questions of fairness, morality, and protecting rights. Many aspects contribute to such fairness, and one of the best-known is the Brady violation, which stems from the 1963 case of Brady v. Maryland.
A Brady violation happens during a trial when the prosecutor fails to disclose evidence that weakens their case, thereby implicating the defendant without trying to prove guilt.
Origins of the Brady Violation
The origins of the Brady violation concept come from the Supreme Court case of Brady v.Maryland in 1963[1]. In this case, John Brady was convicted of first-degree murder[2]. Later, during his defense, Brady’s legal team discovered that a crucial statement from a co-defendant had not been presented, which could have affected the trial’s outcome
The Supreme Court contended that the trial prosecutor is under an obligation to turn over all favorable evidence without exception. Suppression of crucial evidence cannot be used as grounds for conviction. This led to the development of the Brady violation concept, which has since evolved.
A crucial case that further solidified this framework was Kyles v.Whitley[3]. In this case, the Supreme Court reinforced the importance of prosecutorial disclosure[4]and ruled in favor of a defendant whose conviction had been affected by failure to disclose crucial evidence. This decision emphasized the obligation of trial prosecutors to ensure full transparency in criminal trials.
Legal Requirements of a Brady Violation
To establish a Brady violation in court, three key requirements must be met. These requirements form the foundation for any Brady claim and help courts determine whether a defendant’s due process rights have been violated. Let’s examine each requirement in detail to understand what prosecutors must disclose and what defendants must prove.
1. Favorable Evidence to the Defendant
The prosecution must have withheld favorable evidence that is either
Exculpatory Evidence – directly supports the innocence of the defendant
For instance, if a witness statement or DNA evidence[6]could have exonerated a defendant from wrongdoing, but the prosecution failed to disclose it, that would be Brady material.
2. The Prosecution Withheld the Evidence
The prosecution must have omitted the evidence disclosure to the defense. This occurs either:
Intentionally: The prosecution deliberately withholds evidence.
Unintentionally: Evidence is missed or not presented because of carelessness.
Regardless of purpose, the concealment of evidence that may influence the outcome of the trial is a Brady right.
3. The Suppressed Evidence Caused Prejudice
The defendant has to prove that the outcome of the trial would have been different if the evidence had been disclosed.
Here is an example:
If evidence under a key witness’s testimony was forged, and some records proved this, the defendant might argue that had these records been disclosed, they would have changed the verdict.
What is a Brady Motion?
A Brady motion is a motion in which the defense seeks from the court an order forcing the prosecution to release information, the nondisclosure of which relates to the Brady materials. The motion can be made either before the beginning of the trial, contemporaneously with the trial’s progress, or post-conviction.
What Counts as Brady Material?
Brady materials comprise all the evidence that could be beneficial to the accused, inclusive of evidence that may prove the defendant’s innocence and, on the other side, evidence that has the lowest level of incrimination against the accused or casts suspicion on the prosecution’s evidence against the accused.
These can include, but are not limited to, witness statements, photographs, or other evidential materials, as well as documents that can verify the arguments prepared by the defending side in the case.
For example, if a defendant claims he or she did not commit the crime, and there is evidence showing he or she did not, then that evidence will be considered Brady material.
Brady Disclosures: What Happens After a Brady Motion is Granted?
If a Brady motion is granted, the prosecution must disclose all relevant Brady materialto the defense. Failing to do so can result in serious legal consequences, such as:
Conviction reversal: If the withheld evidence is crucial, the court may vacate the conviction.
New trial orders: If the violation undermined the fairness of the original trial.
Sanctions against the prosecution: In severe cases, prosecutors may face disciplinary action.
Brady disclosures can occur before, during, or after trial, depending on when the evidence is discovered. Defense counselors must remain vigilant throughout the case to identify possible Brady violations and protect their client’s rights.
The Impact of Brady Violations on Criminal Defense
Brady violations have major consequences for defendants, prosecutors, and the legal system as a whole.
1. Legal Remedies for the Defendant
If a Brady violation is discovered, the defense lawyer can seek legal remedies such as:
Filing an appeal to challenge the conviction.
Requesting a retrial if the suppressed evidence was critical.
Prosecutors have an ethical duty[8] to ensure a fair trial by disclosing all Brady material. Failure to do so undermines public trust in the justice system. It can lead to misconduct charges against prosecutors. Plus, it may result in disciplinary actions, including disbarment in extreme cases.
3. Broader Justice System Implications
Brady violations highlight the risks of wrongful convictions, emphasizing the need for:
Better oversight of prosecutorial practices.
Stronger accountability measures for evidence disclosure.
Judicial enforcement of fair trial rights.
A Brady violation involves serious injustice in a case such that the outcomes can be mistakenly changed. Where one or more of your close family members, including you suspect critical evidence is not disclosed, legal representation is promptly needed. An experienced district attorney can check case details for potential Brady violations, file a Brady motion to obtain undisclosed evidence, and advocate for a retrial or appeal if a violation occurs.
Need Legal Guidance?
If you suspect that a Brady violation has impacted your case, contacting a defense attorney at Manshoory Law would be a better option for you.
The Federal Controlled Substances Act, established in 1970, categorized drugs into five distinct schedules to streamline legal enforcement and regulatory measures across the United States. These schedules rank substances based on their accepted medical use, potential for abuse, and the likelihood of dependency.
Schedule 3 drugs, recognized for having a moderate to low potential for physical and psychological dependence, still pose significant legal risks. This article delves into the specifics of Schedule III drugs, exploring their legal implications, including the consequences of possession or trafficking charges and the steps one should take if facing such accusations.
What is the Scheduling System for Drugs?
Although Schedule III drug charges aren’t as serious as Schedule I[1] and II crimes, the outcome of your case will have a significant effect on your future. A federal law, enacted in 1970, The Federal Controlled Substances Act[2] classifies controlled substances (drugs) under a single law replacing an assortment of laws that had developed over time. Five separate categories were created by this law.
When classifying a drug, the first step is determining whether or not there are medical uses for the drug, and the second is the drug’s potential negative effect on mental or physical health, including the potential for addiction. The Federal Drug Scheduling System[3] classifies drugs according to how harmful they are and includes Schedule I, II, III, IV, and V. Schedule I is the most harmful and Schedule V has the lowest risk of abuse.
What are Schedule 3 drugs?
California follows the Federal Schedule for listed drugs in California Health and Safety Code § 11056[4] although California refers to them as C-III drugs. Schedule III drugs include narcotics and non-narcotics. Drugs included in the list[5] of Schedule III drugs include narcotics that contain no more than 90 milligrams of codeine per dose.
Examples of Schedule III drugs include:
Dronabinol
Suboxone
Tylenol with codeine
Vicodin
Non-narcotics on the list of Schedule III drugs include:
Anabolic steroids
Ketamine
Benzphetamine
Marinol – a synthetic version of THC
Phendimetrazine
When determining which drugs will be Schedule III drugs, the risk of dependence is considered. Drugs with a moderate or low risk of physical dependence that have a high risk of psychological dependence may be classified as Schedule 3 drugs. They also have a potential for abuse, but that potential is less than drugs classified as Schedule I or II drugs.
The penalties for a Schedule 3 drug charge depend on whether the charge relates to simple drug possession[7] or trafficking.
Civil Penalties
Possession can be charged in two ways. The Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, Public Law. 100-690[8], contains “User Accountability” requirements for the possession of personal use quantities of illegal drugs. The law is codified at 21 U.S.C. § 844a.
In addition to potential criminal penalties, the “User Accountability” law holds users personally accountable by imposing civil penalties. Individuals convicted of possession of a Schedule 3 drug can also be denied public housing assistance and student loans. In some cases, prosecutors will use this law to punish minor drug offenders but don’t leave them with the stain of a criminal record that can impede their ability to support themselves or their families.
The fine can be up to $10,000, but the individual’s income and assets are considered, so it doesn’t burden poor people with impossible fines.
The public record can be destroyed for first offenders who meet the requirements of paying their fine, not being convicted of a crime during the following three years, and passing a drug test. Individuals with prior drug convictions and those who have taken advantage of this provision twice before are not eligible.
Criminal Penalties
Drug possession is also subject to criminal penalties that vary based on the quantity of drugs the person is found in possession of and their criminal history.
First offenders are usually looking at a maximum of 1-year and a fine of up to $1,000.
A second offense requires a minimum sentence of 15 days with a 2-year maximum and a fine of up to $2,500.
The third offense requires a minimum sentence of not less than 90 days and not more than 3-years and up the fine to a minimum of $5,000.
Any offense involving Flunitrazepam has a fine of up to $250,000 and up to 3 years in prison.
Minimum sentences may not be suspended or deferred.
Trafficking
Offenders guilty of trafficking illegal drugs are subject to stiffer penalties outlined in the DEA Enforcement Guide[9].
First offenders may not be sentenced to more than 10 years unless their crime caused serious injury or death, in which case the maximum is 15 years. The individual fine can’t be more than half a million, but if a company is involved, it increases to $2.5 million. The potential penalties and fines double for second offenses.
What to Do If You Have Been Charged with Possession of a Schedule III Drug?
If you are charged with any crime involving Class III drugs, you need a drug crime attorney to represent you and help you fight the accusations. Your personal freedom, finances, and your future depend on the outcome of the case.
Protective orders and restraining orders are similar in that they are intended to protect an individual from the harmful conduct of another, but in California, they serve different purposes. Many people use the terms protective order and restraining order interchangeably, yet the two orders are different, separate, and distinct in the law in both criminal and civil matters.
If you or your loved ones must be kept safe from someone else, you might need a protective or restraining order as per your circumstances.
Criminal vs. Civil Orders
The first and main difference between protective order vs restraining order lies in the legal context[1] in which they are derived.
Protective orders are issued by criminal cases and have to do mostly with domestic violence and other related forms of abuse and are enforced by the prosecution.
On the other hand, restraining orders are filed in civil court and can be used in harassment, stalking, or disputes between individuals who do not have a close relationship.
Both orders can severely limit contact, communication, or physical proximity between individuals, but the legal process to obtain and enforce them is different.
What is a Protective Order?
A protective order in California is a court-issued directive designed to prevent harm or threat from an individual, often in situations involving domestic violence cases, abuse, or criminal activity. These orders are typically part of a criminal case[2], ensuring that the accused cannot contact or set about protecting mortals.
Such orders may be made out at different levels of legal proceedings, such as during an investigation or after a conviction, depending on the severity of the threat posed.
California law provides various forms or types[3]of protective orders, including emergency protective orders, which law enforcement policemen can receive to provide prompt protection, and temporary protective orders which remain in place until a formal hearing is conducted.
What is a Restriction Order?
Restraining order is a court order that legally restrains a person from approaching, threatening, harassing, or engaging in any violent act against another person. Such an order can come from a broader set of circumstances, as opposed to a protective order, which must be obtained through civil court.
A restraining order in California is divided into several categories. These include:
Domestic violencerestraining orders protect against abuse by a spouse, former partner, or family member.
Civil harassment restraining orders[4]apply when the restrained person is not a close family member but presents a threat through continuing harassment or threats.
Protective Order vs Restraining Order: Application Process and Requirements
The process of receiving a protective order is different. Subsequently, law enforcement officers and prosecutors almost always petition for criminal protective orders in such cases of domestic violence or threats. These orders are, as a result, issued most of the time automatically when such a case appears before a criminal court.
On the other hand, restraining orders require the person seeking protection to file a petition[5] in civil court. The petitioner must present evidence of harassment, abuse, or threats and appear before the court. If the judge believes the claims are valid, a temporary restraining order may be issued until a formal hearing determines whether a long-term order is needed.
Duration of Protective Order and Restraining Order in California
In California, theduration of protective[6] order vs restraining ordersvaries based on the type of order:
Emergency Protective Orders (EPOs): These are issued by law enforcement and usually last up to 7 calendar days.
Temporary Restraining Orders (TROs): Such orders last until the court hearing, usually within 20-25 days.
Restraining Orders After Hearing: These can stay up to 5 years. If no end date is specified, the last 3 years can be extended.
Violating A Restraining Order or Protective Order in California
Violating a protective or restraining order in California is a serious offense with significant consequences. The following are the principal points:
Misdemeanor Violation: Violation of a restriction order is usually a misdemeanor punishable by a fine, probation, and/or jail time. The consequences may be up to 1 year in the county jail and a fine of up to $1,000[7].
Felony Violation: If the violation involves violence, threats of violence, or injury, or if you have previous convictions for violating restraining orders. Violation punishments such as felonies can extend to 3 years in jail or prison and a fine of up to $1,000.
Protective Order vs Restraining Order: Can They Be Modified or Extended?
Under some conditions, protective and restraining orders can be changed or extended. If the situation changes, a party may seek a modification of the order so that the terms of the order are changed. This may mean changing restrictions in place on contact, residence, or communication.
For those who want to be protected further, restriction orders can be extended beyond the date of their expiration. The application for extension must be filed before the current order expires, andthe petitioner must show a continued threat or risk. The court will consider the need to extend the order based on the evidence presented.
How to Fight a Protective Order or Restriction Order in California?
If you believe the court order is unjust or unjustified, then you can appeal. Here is how you do it:
Gather Evidence: Collect all evidence that proves that the allegations brought against you are false or overstated.
Follow the Court Order Until the Hearing: Even if you believe the order is unfair, violating it before your court date can lead to criminal charges. Strictly comply with all terms, including no-contact provisions, stay-away distances, and firearm restrictions.
File a Response (Form DV-120 for Domestic Violence Cases): If you receive a Domestic Violence Restraining Order (DVRO)[8], you should file a Response to Request for Domestic Violence Restraining Order (DV-120) before your court hearing.
Knowing the difference between protective and restraining orders allows individuals to make good decisions. Although both are safety orders, their application, duration, and enforcement are totally different.
Cannabis cultivation isillegal in California. There are a lot of people doing cannabis cultivation, but most of them are legally allowed to do so.
Many of you are probably wondering why the law favors a few individuals while they are punishing other people for marijuana cultivation. Marijuana can be considered a type of drug, and it can be used as a medication for certain diseases like AIDS, cancer, seizures, and more.
Cannabis growing laws in California are very strict[1] and if you are found guilty, you might face jail time and a fine. If you are thinking about cannabis cultivation, here are a few things that you should know about the laws in California.
Can you Legally Grow Marijuana in California?
Marijuana cultivation is more or less the growing of marijuana. In most places around the globe, growing marijuana is illegal. However, in some parts of the United States, you are given a cannabis cultivation license to legally grow cannabis.
California is loosening up its restrictions when it comes to cannabis cultivation. Although growing cannabis is still a serious offense, there are several ways in which you will be allowed to grow marijuana without breaking any laws.
In the past, you could only grow marijuana for medical purposes, but under Proposition 64[2], people living in California can now grow cannabis for recreational purposes.
California Cannabis Growing Laws
Under Proposition 64, drug cultivation for recreational use is legal[3], but there are restrictions on who can grow the plant and the amount that can be cultivated.
It will only be legal if both of the following statements are true:
The marijuana cultivator is 21 years or older
He/she cultivates no more than six cannabis plants.
Aside from these two, there are certain restrictions placed to make sure that they won’t go overboard. The cultivator needs to follow local ordinances placed by the city and they can only grow up to six weed plants in a single residence.
It means that even if you are living with your partner in a private residence, you can only grow up to six plants. In general, you can only grow weed indoors or within your private property. You can only do so in a locked space or in any area that is not visible to the public.
Penalties for Illegally Cultivating Cannabis
For marijuana cultivation, penalties for growing weed illegally can be divided into three:
Infraction: You will be given an infraction if[4] you are between 18 to 20 years old and you are growing weed in your house. It is punishable by a fine of $100.
Misdemeanor: You will be charged with a misdemeanor if you are 21 years or older and you are growing more than six plants. You might be put into custody in the county jail for up to six months or receive a fine of up to $500.
Felony:You will be charged with a felony when you are cultivating more than six plants and you are guilty of one of the following:
Violated environmental laws on cultivating marijuana
The penalty for a felony[6] is up to three years in jail and a fine of $10,000. There is also a marijuana law on possession and sale. You are only allowed to possess up to one ounce of dried marijuana or eight grams of concentrated cannabis.
You need a cannabis cultivation license if you want to be a seller of marijuana. It means that it is illegal to sell weed if you don’t have a license to do it. You are only allowed to grow your weed, but you are not allowed to sell it. You cannot give it to minors as well.
Growing and using marijuana for recreational purposes has become legal in some states, but they are still regulating it to make sure that the users won’t get too addicted. If you are penalized for growing marijuana, you can always get the best criminal defense lawyers in Los Angeles that would represent you in court.These professionals can also help you understand what you need to know to grow marijuana legally in your area.
What are the Defenses of the Unlawful Cultivation of Cannabis?
The following defenses are available to individuals charged with cultivating greater than six cannabis plants:
The cannabis belonged to another individual;
The defendant was not aware that the cannabis was where it was found;
The defendant was not aware that the cannabis was, in fact, cannabis;
The defendant is a licensed medical cannabis user whose medical needs require him/her to cultivate more marijuana than California law otherwise allows; or
If you have been charged with unlawful cultivation of cannabis, and you believe you are within one or more of the above-listed exemptions, contact the Manshoory Law Group as soon as possible.
The attorneys at Manshoory Law Group have extensive knowledge of and experience in the ever-changing area of drug law, and we will ensure that you are provided with an effective and aggressive defense so that you have the best possible opportunity at defending the charges asserted against you.
The insanity defense has sparked debates and confusion in criminal law. When defendants claim they’re not guilty because they were insane, they’re saying they couldn’t tell right from wrong when they broke the law. But proving insanity in court isn’t easy. It needs both legal and medical experts to weigh in.
Understanding “Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity”: What is Insanity Plea?
An insanity plea is a legal strategy[1] used in criminal cases[2]. The defendant uses this theory to say that they were not in control of their actions or mind due to a severe mental disorder. This means that they should not be blamed for the crime. It is different from the competency to stand trial[3], which is a determination of whether someone can take part in a trial. Being fit to stand trial checks if someone can take part in court. The insanity defense, however, looks at the person’s state of mind when they broke the law.
Legal Standard for Insanity Defense
Some legal standards help to determine criminal insanity in US courts. These are:
M’naghten Rule[4]: This rule determines whether the defendants were not able to distinguish right from wrong due to mental illness or deficiencies. The courts could consider a person legally insane if they couldn’t understand what they were doing or if it was wrong.
Model Penal Code’s standard for the insanity defense: This standard looks at “substantial capacity” – if the defendant could know or understand his actions or handle his behavior due to mental illness. Some states use a version of this test called the irresistible impulse test[5], which determines whether a defendant could control their actions despite knowing they were wrong.
Process of Proving Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity
Successfully claiming to protect an insanity defense involves a rigorous legal and medical procedure. Here are the major stages:
Proof of evidence: In most places, defense has the responsibility to show that the defendant was not guilty due to insanity when crime happened. Some states require “clear and concrete evidence”, while others use the “pre -evidence of evidence” standard.
Testing proceedings: Health professional experts act as witnesses and talk about the mental state of the defendant during the trial. The prosecution often argues that the defendants meant to commit a crime and knew what they were doing.
Plea of insanity: The defense lawyer should raise the argument of an insanity plea at the initial stage of the legal process, usually during the prosecution.
Psychiatry test: The accused should conduct several psychiatric tests to investigate whether they are insane. A forensic psychologist[6] or psychiatrist does this test.
What Happens After a Successful Insanity Defense?
When a defendant is found not guilty because of insanity, he or she does not walk free; normally, they are committed to a mental institution for proper medical treatment. Confinement duration may depend on the level of their condition and according to state regulations.
Hospitalization and Treatment: A defendant will receive psychiatric care for proper treatment and monitoring.
Periodic Reviews: Courts check the mental status of the accused periodically and then determine if they are still dangerous to society.
Potential Release: If the court and mental health professionals determine that the accused is no longer a danger to society, they may be released conditionally or fully.
In some cases, a defendant may spend more time in a mental institution than they would have if they were convicted and sentenced to prison.
Legal Representation in Verdicts of Not Guilty by Reason of insanity
The not-guilty-by-reason-of-insanity verdict case requires professional legal services. An experienced criminal defense attorney helps to develop a solid defense through medical evidence, psychiatric expert involvement, and powerful arguments in court. As laws on insanity defense differ from state to state, legal advice is given to the case to make sure it is in accordance with the jurisdictional requirements and standards.
A professional lawyer also assists defendants in navigating the legal process from pre-trial evaluations to post-trial commitments, fighting for fair treatment. Selecting a lawyer who is experienced in mental health law can significantly improve the likelihood of an effective defense and ensure the defendant receives appropriate care rather than punitive treatment.
Proving not guilty by reason of insanity is a challenging legal battle requiring substantial evidence, psychiatric evaluations, and skilled legal representation. While it can offer an alternative to traditional criminal punishment, it often results in long-term psychiatric treatment rather than complete freedom.
If you or someone you know is facing this situation, seeking a qualified attorney is essential. Contact Manshoory Law Group to schedule your consultation today!
Arson in California has become a pressing concern for law enforcement and communities. As devastating blazes continue to sweep through Southern California, authorities face challenges in determining whether fires are deliberately set or occur naturally. Recent incidents, including the Palisades Fire in Los Angeles[1], underscore the importance of understanding the legal framework surrounding arson charges and prosecution.
What is Arson Under California Law?
California law defines[2] arson as starting fires with malicious intent on buildings, forests, or other properties. The Eaton fires[3] in California arson cases are prosecuted under Penal Code 451 and 452, distinguishing between malicious and reckless burning. To successfully prosecute an arson case, law enforcement agencies in Los Angeles and beyond must establish intent and demonstrate that the fire was deliberately set.
Additionally, the investigation of arson in California fire cases presents distinct problems in Los Angeles County due to the city’s unusual combination of urban areas and natural wilderness spaces. The County District Attorney’s office needs to study all the facts to decide if fires were intentionally set or if they appeared naturally.
How Arson Contributes To California Fires?
Natural conditions like dry weather, wind, and dense vegetation make California particularly vulnerable to wildfires. The effects of fires in California arson become deadly when someone decides to start them on purpose. The Palisades Fire demonstrated how human actions can exacerbate wildfire disasters, which destroyed thousands in a single incident.
The Los Angeles Police and Fire departments and other local agencies dedicate significant resources to tracing the sources of wildfires. However, “there is no data supporting winds bringing out arsonists,”[4]a former detective with the L.A. County Sheriff’s Office said. According to the National Interagency Fire Center, arson may account for over 20% of human-caused wildland fires. However, the actual figure remains uncertain, as arson cases are often misclassified initially and may take time to be properly identified.
Legal Penalties for Arson in California
There are severe penalties for arson in California fires, reflecting the devastating impact these crimes can have on lives and property.
Convictions depend on several factors:
Type of Arson: Whether someone started the firesdeliberately or without care.
Injuries or Fatalities: Fires resulting in bodily harm or death carry harsher sentences
Extent of Damage: Significant property loss or damage to essential infrastructure influences sentencing.
Under Section 451, penalties may include:
If someone commits arson that results in great bodily injury, it’s considered a felony[5] and can lead to imprisonment forfive, seven, or nine years in state prison.
If the fire causes an inhabited structure (like a home) or inhabited property to burn, that’s also a felony, with a potential prison time of three, five, or eight years.
Setting fire to a structure or forest land can result in a felony charge as well, with prison sentences ranging from two to six years.
Lastly, if someone commits arson targeting tangible property, it’s another felony that could lead to 16 months to three years in prison.
Defenses to Arson Charges in California
Lack of Intent: The intent in setting a fire must be deliberate and malicious because arson does not include actions performed without intent. This may be a strong defense claim if a fire was started without intent.
Case of Mistaken Identity: This may be a defense plan strategy when there is not enough evidence to show that the accusation made against is true.
Not Enough Evidence: The prosecution must prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, if the evidence presented against the defendant is weak or circumstantial, this factor may be raised.
Alibi: If the accused can prove they were elsewhere when the fire occurred, this can be a defense.
False Accusation: Certain individuals may have been arsonists only to be charged with arson assaults themselves because of misunderstanding.
Investigations and Evidence in Arson Cases
An investigation of the fire is also referred to as an arson investigation, the focus of which is to determine the fire’s origin and cause[6], with the ultimate aim of understanding its purpose. When foul play is suspected, investigators prioritize gathering evidence to identify the arsonist and build a strong case for prosecution.
An arson investigation is often intricate and involves the collaboration of several specialists. Proper understanding of the science in regards to fire, ranging from where it starts to how it can engulf a certain level of area, is a must for fire investigators.
Evidence in Arson Prosecutions
Evidence in arson cases[7] is essential to prove guilt. Generally, it encompasses both physical evidence that can be obtained from the fire scene, such as accelerants, peculiar burn patterns, etc., and circumstantial evidence that may relate to the defendant’s motive or opportunity.
Proper collection and preservation of the evidence make sure that they are admissible in court, which involves adhering to legal standards, maintaining a chain of custody, and protecting the rights of the accused.
The Role of Climate in Arson Charges
As climate change continues to reshape California’s landscape and weather patterns[8], its impact extends beyond environmental concerns into the legal realm, particularly regarding arson cases.
The intersection of climate conditions and fire-related crimes has created new challenges for both law enforcement and the judicial system, leading to several key considerations:
Increased Fire Risk: Rising temperatures and prolonged droughts create conditions where fires can easily ignite and spread, meaning even small acts of arson can result in major wildfires.
Severity of Fires: Fires are becoming more intense, with incidents like the Park Fire in 2024[9], linked to arson, burning 429,603 acres, and becoming one of the largest in California’s history.
Legal Implications: California’s arson laws factor in intent and damage. As climate change worsens fire conditions, the penalties for arson can be even harsher.
Steps to Take if Accused of Arson
Individuals charged with arson in Southern California should act quickly to protect their legal rights:
Hire a county district attorney who has experience in handling arson cases.
As California faces severe wildfires, understanding arson laws is pivotal. Prosecuting arson cases requires balancing strict enforcement with consideration of environmental factors. It’s essential to hold accountable those who deliberately start fires while proving these cases beyond a reasonable doubt.
In Southern California, especially Los Angeles County, ongoing cooperation among law enforcement, fire investigators, and the legal system is paramount. With climate conditions promoting fire spread, preventing and prosecuting arson is vital for protecting lives and property statewide.
California does have the death penalty as part of its legal system. However, its implementation has been anything but straightforward, influenced by complex legal battles and shifting public opinion over the years. While the death penalty remains in place in California, recent procedural changes have significantly shaped its application.
What is the Death Penalty?
Capital punishment or the death penalty, is a juridical sentence[1], a type of punishment, according to which an offender is executed by the state. The death penalty in California has been practiced right from when the state was formed in 1851. It has been shifted through a number of legislative amendments as well as undergone subsequent voters’ votes due to the changes in the people’s perception of capital punishment.
Does California Have the Death Penalty? History of the Death Penalty in California
California’s history with the death penalty is marked by numerous legal battles and public discourse[2]. The state reinstated capital punishment in California in 1978 after a brief moratorium, leading to a surge in death sentences. However, this surge was accompanied by growing concerns aboutwrongful convictions and racial disparities in sentencing.
Understanding Proposition 34
In 2012, California voters faced Proposition 34[3], which sought to abolish the death penalty and replace it with life imprisonment without parole. The proposition was narrowly defeated, with approximately 48% voting for abolition. This outcome demonstrated that while there is significant support for reforming capital punishment, many Californians still believe in its necessity.
Understanding Proposition 62
Proposition 62[4] was another attempt to abolish the death penalty, appearing on the ballot in 2016. Like its predecessor, it aimed to replace capital punishment with life imprisonment without parole. However, it was also defeated by a margin of about 54% against. This repeated rejection of abolition efforts highlights the complexity of public opinion regarding capital punishment in California.
Understanding Proposition 66
In contrast to Propositions 34 and 62, Proposition 66 aimed to expedite the appeals process for death penalty cases while maintaining capital punishment as an option. Passed by voters in November 2016, this measure sought to address concerns about lengthy delays in executing death sentences. Proposition 66[5] reflects a desire among some voters to reform rather than eliminate the death penalty in California.
California Death Penalty Laws
The California death penalty laws are provided under various California Penal Codes. The main law governing capital punishment is in Penal Code Section 190[6] which deals with association and capital crimes and the procedure for arriving at the punishment.
A number of criminal activities commonly attract the death penalty:
First-degree murder[7] is accompanied by special circumstances like causing the death of many people, or killing a police officer or a person during particular other crimes like robbery[8], rape, and others.
After conviction, the defendants undergo another procedure to come up with the verdict to either set a death penalty or life imprisonment without eligibility for parole.
The death penalty in California is a legal procedure and involves a number of steps and appeal and review phases. Each defendant given a death penalty has the right to appeal convictions and the corresponding penalties through various other state and federal courts. This long process may at times take several years or even decades before an execution can be affected.
Moratorium on Executions in California
In the same month of March 2019, Governor Gavin Newsomsigned an executive order[9] that halted executions in California. This order stopped all executions while serving as the governor and demanded the shutdown of the execution chamber in the San Quentin State Pen. Although this moratorium does not eliminate the death penalty itself, it influences its application in very many ways.
The hope is that the moratorium is in response to mounting concerns regarding equity and efficiency of applying the capital penalty under the criminal justice system of California[10].
Critics have continued to observe that race and geography are skewed in California death penalty cases, resulting in an overrepresentation of minority populations and geographical areas dominated by people of color.
For instance, studies indicated[11] that African American defendants were more likely to be sentenced to death if they kill whites than if they kill people of other colors.
Statistics on the California Death Penalty
As of late 2024, there are approximately 700 inmates[12]on California’s death row, making it one of the largest death row populations in the United States. Execution statistics reveal that California has not carried out an execution since January 2017 due to Governor Newsom’s moratorium. Furthermore, there have been significant concerns regarding wrongful convictions; at least 235 individuals[13] on California’s death row have had their judgments reversed since 1989.
Racial disparities continue to be a pressing issue within capital punishment cases. Research indicates that black defendants are disproportionately sentenced to death compared to their white counterparts. Such disparities raise ethical questions about fairness in sentencing practices and highlight systemic issues within California’s criminal justice system.
The debate[14] about the morality and efficacy of the California death penalty continues. Though capital punishment has not been outlawed in California, recent advancements show that authorities, like Governor Newsom, are trying to reconsider the position of capital punishment in the state.
If Californians keep changing their views on capital punishment, future laws may alter how it is applied or even abolish it entirely. For those interested in criminal justice reform or the moral and legal issues surrounding state executions, understanding this situation is important.
If anyone wants to advocate for their rights, needs legal advice, or requires a lawyer for criminal cases, including capital offenses, it’s best to consult experienced criminal defense attorneys.
For further information on criminal defense issues or consultation from an experienced Los Angeles criminal defense attorney, please visit or contact Manshoory Law.
We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. Agree
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
