Trusted Criminal Defense Attorneys In Southern California
I agree to receive promotional content and notifications from Manshoory Law Group through email or text message. For further details, kindly refer to our Privacy Policy.
04% BAC if operating a vehicle for hires such as a Lyft or Uber driver
05% BAC
Adult DUI, .08% BAC
It doesn’t matter if alcohol is the result of drinking alcohol or from cold medicines that contain alcohol. In addition to a DUI charge for blood alcohol content (BAC) above the limits noted above, legal and illegal drugs that impair a driver’s ability to operate a vehicle safely including cold medicines, pain killers, marijuana, and street drugs can result in DUI penalties.
What is a “Zero Tolerance” DUI law?
Anyone under the age of 21 who is discovered driving while intoxicated is subject to California’s zero-tolerance law for underage drinkers. This law says that a blood alcohol reading of 0.01% or higher is treated as a traffic infraction and punished with a suspension of a person’s driver’s license for one year.
The blood alcohol level is typically measured at the time of the stop using a breathalyzer or other similar device. Note that alcohol from any source, including medication like cough syrup, is subject to this law, and if the driver refuses to submit to this testing, he/she is subject to an extension of driver’s license suspension of up to three years.
However, just like adult DUI license suspensions, the driver has the right to challenge the license suspension in front of the DMV, or seek restricted driving privileges if the challenge is unsuccessful.
Underage Drinking with a BAC of 0.05% or Higher
In addition to the zero-tolerance law for underage intoxicated driving, California has another law that elevates the penalties for underage drivers with a blood alcohol level of 0.05% or higher. This reading is usually confirmed by an additional test at the police station.
This violation is still not considered a misdemeanor but does punish the driver with a one-year license suspension, a $100 fine, and a mandatory alcohol education program of three months or more. It is important to mention that any driver under the age of 21 that registers a blood alcohol level of 0.08% or more is considered legally impaired, and will be charged under the standard adult DUI offense laws.
Possessing Alcohol While Under the Age of 21
Finally, if an underage driver knowingly operates a vehicle that contains alcohol he/she could face charges for a misdemeanor offense unless the driver is accompanied by a parent, adult relative, or adult designated by the parent.
In addition, if the driver is not accompanied by an adult there is still a defense to this crime if the driver was in the process of following a parent’s instructions on transporting/delivering the alcohol.
Because this is a criminal offense, the possible penalties include impoundment of the vehicle for up to 30 days if it is registered in the name of the underage driver, a $1,000 fine, and a one-year suspension of the driver’s license.
What are the Penalties for an Underage DUI?
The penalties for underage DUI vary by the blood alcohol level, whether you submit to a chemical test when you are stopped, prior convictions, whether there are minors under age 14 in the vehicle being operated by an impaired underage driver, whether or not there is an accident, and if there is an accident, the extent of the injuries.
If the underage driver refuses to submit to a chemical BAC test, there is an automatic 1-year suspension of the driver’s license whether or not the arrest results in an under 21 DUI conviction. If the driver is an adult (age 18 – 20) and has a BAC of .05%, they will generally be required to attend a mandatory alcohol education program.
When injuries are involved, the driver may be charged with a misdemeanor or felony, at the prosecutor’s discretion. Injuries can lead to prison time that is tied to the extent of the injuries. In other words, the more severe the injuries caused by the impaired driver are, the longer the prison sentence is likely to be.
Getting an underage DUI in California when you have a prior conviction will lead to a 2-year revocation of your driver’s license.
An under 21 DUI that exceeds the legal limit for an adult DUI (.08% BAC) has stiffer penalties which can include 3 – 5 years of misdemeanor probation, fines, mandatory drug or alcohol education programs, and may include jail time.
When you refuse a lawful request for a chemical test to determine your blood alcohol level, the DMV can suspend or revoke your license regardless of the outcome of your DUI charge and you may be given enhanced penalties if you are convicted.
How Many People are Killed by Drunk Drivers?
According to the Center for Disease Control (CDC), a government agency that tracks statistics related to death and injury:
The risk that an underage driver between the ages of 16 – 20 will die in a car accident is 17 times higher when their BAC is .08% than it is when they are sober. That’s a sobering statistic, especially when added to the three times greater risk a teen driver has of dying in an automobile accident even when they are sober.
One out of five teenagers who are involved in a fatal accident drank alcohol before the crash.
Every day, six teenagers’ lives are cut short because they die from injuries sustained during a motor vehicle accident. Many of these deaths were preventable. Not drinking and driving reduce the risk of premature death.
What Happens if You Get a DUI in California under 21?
If you are arrested, you should use your best manners. Be polite. Do your best to remain calm. Use deep breathing exercises to help yourself calm down. Follow all the officer’s instructions. Refusing to follow instructions makes things worse for you and may increase the charges against you.
Do not admit to anything. In fact, say as little as possible. Don’t volunteer information. Provide the officer with your license, proof of insurance, and vehicle registration. If they ask you questions, tell them you need to talk to your lawyer before you answer.
However, as an underage driver, refusing to submit to a BAC test will result in automatic penalties. You can, however, refuse field sobriety tests without penalties. Pay attention to what is said, the order it is said, and specific words. For example, if the officer tells you that you may lose your license for a year if you refuse to take the BAC instead of you will lose your license, it can make a difference in court.
If you are arrested, you’ll want the best criminal defense attorney in Los Angeles to represent you so contact us as soon as possible. You have a very limited time to request a hearing (10 days).
Finally, when it is all over if you qualify, you should look into having your DUI expunged from your record as a DUI in California will show up on background checks employers and landlords conduct in the future if it is not expunged.
On July 1, the new budget was active and allowed for $5 million towards funding a new program that allows victims of crimes to confront their offenders. The money was used to fund the program for 5 yearsand it will allow offenders of any age to participate, not just those who are juvenile which has traditionally been the case with this type of program.
The program pairs victims and offenders before the conviction occurs. The benefit for offenders is that if they go through the program they can avoid a criminal record which impacts the rest of their lives outside of prison.
How does Diversion Work in California?
Those who are proponents of the plan believe that it is going to be beneficial for both survivors as well as criminals. Survivors get closure and a piece that is needed for them to help heal more thoroughly. Offenders may be deterred from continuing to repeat criminal offenses once out of prison because they have had the opportunity to leave their sentence with a clean slate, thus giving them a second chance at life without the blot of crimes on their records.
It is a program that allows for a more personal look at crimes for both parties and participates in forgiveness which may have a strong and valuable impact in the long term. It is a means to make a bad situation into a good one for both sides of the equation.
Who is Eligible for Diversion Program in California?
This is a state-funded program and only those offenders who do not exhibit an extensive criminal record are eligible. Additionally, those who have been convicted of sex crimes and murder will not be eligible. Crimes that are highly associated with violence such as robbery, assault, burglary, and criminal threats would be eligible.
Working together with community groups, law enforcement, defense attorneys, the offenders, and victims a plan will be developed that will meet the needs of the survivors while also promoting a strategy to help the offender avoid engaging in more crimes in the future. In order to accomplish this, substance abuse treatment, counseling, education, and job training may all play a role. Victims can have the ability to obtain restitution or even a letter of apology.
There will be tracking done on those who successfully complete the totality of the program to determine its effectiveness. Looking at factors like victim satisfaction as well as new crimes committed or lack of crimes committed by offenders will be evaluated.
Get the Best Outcome Possible with Proper Defense
Individuals who have been charged with criminal offenses have the right to a solid defense. The use of a Southern California criminal defense attorney at the Manshoory Law Group, APC can help you when you are facing a criminal trial. We specialize in criminal defense and we are experts in criminal law.
We know about all the opportunities that are available to you to help you with your case, such as new programs including this diversion program opportunity. You don’t have to go through this process alone, our team of Los Angeles criminal defense attorneys can help.
Call us at 877-977-7750 and speak to one of our resourceful Southern California criminal defense attorneys today.
The Federal Controlled Substances Act (The Act) was passed in 1970 in response to growing public concern about drug abuse. The Act condensed a mishmash of prior laws under one law and created a classification system for controlled substances.
Congress expressed concern about the detrimental effect on the health and welfare of Americans when the drugs were used improperly.
How Does Drug Classification Work?
The Act created five categories of drugs and created a schedule based on two main factors:
Whether there were legitimate medical uses for the drug that is necessary to provide for health and wellbeing
The potential of the drug to have a detrimental effect on mental or physical health, including the potential for physical or psychological addiction
Other factors that are considered when a drug is classified include the history of the substance, including whether it has been abused in the past, scientific knowledge about the substance, the drug’s relationship to other controlled substances, and the potential effects on public health.
Controlled substances in this category have a high potential for abuse and no accepted medical uses. The potential for abuse is derived from a combination of the mood-altering effects of the drug and whether it is addictive. Examples of Schedule I drugs include heroin, LSD, marijuana, and some club drugs, such as ecstasy.
Schedule II drugs are distinct from Schedule I drugs because they have accepted medical uses. However, they are considered dangerous as the result of their potential to cause addiction. The addiction can be physical or psychological. In some cases, it is not the presence of a specific drug, but the quantity of the drug in a prescribed medication that determines whether it is a Schedule II drug. For example, a drug with less than 15 milligrams of hydrocodone like Vicodin is a Schedule II drug. Examples of drugs in this category include cocaine, OxyCotin, Adderall, and Ritalin.
Drugs listed on Schedule III have, at most, moderate potential for addiction and may present a low likelihood of physical or psychological dependence. The dosage is a factor in determining whether a drug is a Schedule III drug. For example, Tylenol with codeine-containing less than 90 milligrams of codeine per dose is a Schedule III drug. Other drugs in this category include testosterone, anabolic steroids, and ketamine.
Schedule IV
Medications in this category include mood-altering drugs with a low risk of dependence, milder pain relievers such as Tramadol, and treatments for insomnia like Ambien. Other Schedule IV drugs include Xanax, Darvon, Darvocet, Valium, Soma, Ativan, and Talwin.
Schedule V
Substances, chemicals, and drugs with the lowest risk of abuse and addiction are classified in Schedule V. While they may contain low dosages of narcotics, the doses are very small. They are most commonly used to treat common medical problems such as diarrhea, coughs, and congestion. Examples of Schedule V drugs include Robitussin AC, Lyrica, Logen, and Kapectolin. An alphabetic list of scheduled drugs is available.
Although The Act defines controlled substances as “a drug or other substance, or immediate precursor, included in Schedule I, II, III, IV, or V,” an unlisted drug may be treated the same as a Schedule I or II drugs for purposes of prosecution when it meets the same criteria as listed drugs in those categories.
For example, designer drugs that mimic the effect of drugs in these classifications are not approved as legal medications in the United States.
Can a Drug be Rescheduled?
Drugs may be scheduled temporarily or permanently in a variety of ways. Congress always has the authority to add or remove drugs or change their classification. Congress delegated the authority to add drugs to the United States Attorney General when it passed the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984, which gives the Attorney General the authority to temporarily add substances as Schedule I controlled substances when they pose “imminent hazards to public safety.”
When the Attorney General exercises this power:
The substance immediately becomes subject to the registration and recordkeeping requirements required for Schedule I drugs.
The drug will remain listed for two years with the potential of adding a 3rd year before the listing must be removed or made permanent.
The creation of synthetic drugs made it necessary to create a way to quickly respond when new and potentially dangerous drugs are introduced.
Additionally, drugs may be moved from one category to another by either Congressional or administrative action by the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA). This includes the ability to remove a drug from the schedule entirely. The classifications make specific drug offenses subject to mandatory minimum sentencing requirements.
Anyone facing drug charges should be familiar with the classification system and the recordkeeping and registration requirements to avoid criminal prosecution.
Part of the job of a law enforcement officer is to search for evidence of a crime, take that evidence for examination, then use it in a trial. This is called “search and seizure”. The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and Article I, Section 13 California Constitution have laws against “unreasonable search and seizure”. The laws surrounding what makes a search reasonable or unreasonable are complex. We will explain them in this article.
What Makes A Search And Seizure Legal in California?
There are three components to look at. The first is whether or not the area searched is considered to be private by society. This is called “reasonable expectation of privacy.” Places like your home, your electronic devices, or even a hotel room or a tent fall into this category. But the abandoned property, like trash you’ve thrown out or something you threw out of a car, do not have this expectation and are fair game for search and seizure.
If it is private, the police may still search it if one of two things apply. The first is if they have a search warrant. The laws in California for search warrants can be found here. Police have to convince a judge that there may be evidence that a felony was committed. If the judge believes there is probable cause that this is true, they will write a warrant that gives the police the right to search that area for evidence related to that crime alone. The last thing to consider is whether the search would fall into one of the many exceptions to the warrant law.
These include things like:
The owner of the property gave consent to a search.
You’ve been arrested lawfully and the police want to safeguard evidence that might be destroyed.
There is an immediate danger to life or property.
An item is in plain view and obviously incriminating.
There are also specific exceptions for vehicles and electronic devices that are derived from these ideas.
Take vehicles, for instance:
During temporary detention, an officer might believe you have access to a weapon or is otherwise dangerous. The police can search to preserve the safety of everyone.
A shakier reason is if the police believe they have probable cause that a vehicle contains evidence of a crime, like if they believe they smell alcohol or drugs.
For electronic devices:
Police can access the device in an emergency situation or aid in pursuing a fleeing suspect.
Police can also search devices when you’re crossing an international border if they have probable cause.
Note that police can still take an electronic device and hold it until they get a warrant for a legal search.
Remember if you give consent to the police for a search then any evidence they find is legal! It doesn’t matter if the area has a reasonable expectation of privacy. If you consent to a search, you waive your Fourth Amendment rights.
What Constitutes An Illegal Search And Seizure?
If the police or the judge doesn’t follow the rules, then the search and seizure could be deemed illegal. For example, a warrant could be challenged if it can be proven that:
The police mislead the judge.
The warrant was too broad.
The search exceeded the limits of the warrant.
The judge was biased
If the police do a search based on probable cause or due to one of the exceptions, they will have to prove that their search fell under the exceptions. If it can be proven otherwise, the search and any evidence collected in relation to the search will be illegal evidence.
The trickiest areas are when it’s unclear whether or not society has decided there is a reasonable expectation of privacy. Electronic devices are used to fall into this category. Prior to 2014, there was no reasonable expectation of privacy for electronic devices in California. Police were free to search phones and computers as they pleased. However, that is now illegal without a warrant thanks to a California Supreme Court ruling.
What Happens If An Unlawful Search And Seizure Is Discovered?
Unlawful search and seizure does happen, but how can you challenge it? Your criminal defense lawyer can file something called a “motion to suppress” before your trial starts. In the motion, your criminal defense lawyer will offer their arguments about why a search and seizure was illegal and why the evidence found should not count under California’s “exclusionary rule”.
If the judge agrees that the search was unlawful, the state will be unable to use any evidence collected in that search. Depending on the nature of the crime and the evidence suppressed, the prosecution may be forced to use a lesser charge or to drop all charges because they lack the evidence to proceed.
There is also a second way your lawyer can challenge the legality of a search and seizure. Sometimes the police will gain legal evidence indirectly through an illegal manner. If there is no way they could have found that evidence without the illegal search and seizure, that evidence can be excluded under the “fruit of the poisonous tree” rule. However, the prosecution does have ways to challenge this so it is a weaker way to suppress evidence.
One of the things that a criminal lawyer will do for you is to examine how the police obtained their evidence. If they believe that it was obtained illegally through an unlawful search and seizure it will be challenged. If the circumstances fall in your favor, you may never have to go to trial.
Ask for Help from Illegal Search and Seizure Lawyer
However, if your case goes all the way to trial without challenging the evidence then it will be much harder to dismiss what is presented. This is why it is so crucial that you get a lawyer skilled at challenging unlawful search and seizures on your side as soon as possible after your arrest.
If you are arrested in Los Angeles, don’t wait until it is too late. Contact Manshoory Law Group for a consultation.Explain your reasons why you think the evidence against you was illegally obtained. We will fight hard to force the prosecution to prove that they did everything by the book.
Gangs are considered to be a serious threat to society. Rather than one individual robbing a merchant, for example, gangs are structured and arranged to achieve a specific end. Accordingly, law enforcement agencies have put a lot of effort into mitigating the effect of gangs. One way in which this is accomplished is through the compilation of gang databases, such as CalGang in California.
By focusing on known gang members, law enforcement is able to keep a closer watch on these individuals in an effort to keep society safe. However, in some cases, individuals may be put on CalGang without notice and without membership in a gang – they have slipped through the cracks. In these cases, it is imperative to retain the services of an experienced criminal defense attorney as soon as possible to implement a process for removal from the CalGang database.
Unfortunately, inadvertent inclusion on the CalGang database is not as far-fetched as one would think, as this article illustrates. As mentioned in the article, some have claimed that the database encourages racial profiling. A discussion of the CalGang database will follow below.
What is The CalGang Database?
CalGang, like most State gang databases, is a compilation of individuals who meet a number of criteria that, ostensibly, prove membership in a gang. Unfortunately, membership in a gang is a highly-subjective determination, and each county that participates in CalGang has differing categories for inclusion into the database.
This is actually a feature of the program, and not a bug, as law enforcement does not want gang members to hide certain aspects of their lives which would not get them placed on the database.
However, there are some factors that are common with most counties, and include the following:
Admission of gang membership;
Tattoos depicting gang affiliations;
Clothing consistent with gang membership;
Gang graffiti on personal property;
Identification as a gang member (from another gang member, a rival gang member, a reliable informant, a family member, or another law enforcement agency);
Association with known gang members, including prior arrests with such individuals; and
Attendance at gang functions or known gang hangouts.
What Can I Do to Get Removed from CalGang?
For instances in which an individual is improperly placed on CalGang, California law allows him/her to petition for removal. As set forth in the statute, the individual must first request removal from the law enforcement agency responsible for placing him/her on the database. This petition gives a court the authority to review the law enforcement agency’s denial. The petition must be filed within 90 days of the denial.
In its review, the court will look at the documentation provided by the law enforcement agency as its basis for denying the individual’s request for removal. If the court determines that the law enforcement agency has failed to establish, by clear and convincing evidence, the individual’s active, associate, or affiliate status of gang membership, the court shall order the law enforcement agency to remove the name of the individual from the gang database.
Speaking to an experienced criminal defense attorney can help ensure that an individual’s petition is viable, and will use their skill to ensure that the information in front of the court gives the individual the best chance at success.
Speak to a Criminal Defense Attorney
If you have recently discovered that you are listed on the CalGang database, and are curious as to what this means, as well as how and whether you can get yourself off the database, contact the criminal attorneys at Manshoory Law Group, APC as soon as possible.
The attorneys at our office have years of experience in criminal defense matters, including an understanding of what is involved with someone’s name being added to the CalGang database.
The attorneys there are available 24/7 to take your call. Contact our lawyers today for an initial consultation.
Being convicted of a crime, and serving out a punishment, unfortunately, is oftentimes not the end of an individual’s ordeal. A criminal conviction is a public record that can be accessed by anyone, including potential employers, landlords, licensing agencies, and professional organizations, by simply searching a database. Having a criminal conviction on one’s record can mean a much tougher experience in obtaining a job, receiving a business license, or applying for credit, as well as any number of other barriers that society has deemed necessary.
Fortunately, California provides a procedure by which certain individuals convicted of a crime can have their records expunged. This process will take the conviction off a person’s record, and allow him/her to truthfully and legally tell an employer they have no criminal record. This is a fairly easy process once it is determined a person qualifies, but it should be noted that, unlike other states, California does not completely erase the criminal conviction from the state record system. Instead, the case is reopened and is listed as “dismissed in the interests of justice.”
While this may seem like a hollow victory, potential employers are not allowed to use this type of record against an applicant or even reference it in the interview. As the vast majority of individuals will need to undertake this procedure only once, it is especially important to retain the services of an experiencedcriminal defense attorney to assist in the expungement process, as the process is complex, and the failure to adhere to all nuances could mean denial of a petition.
However, although California has recently expanded the offenses which are eligible for expungement, as well as streamlining the process, it still is time-consuming. As a recent article illustrates, a group advocating for those who are able to have their records expunged has developed an algorithm to assist in doing just that.
What Crimes Are Eligible for Expungement?
As mentioned above, only certain crimes are eligible for expungement under the current procedure. Specifically, expungement is not available for the following crimes:
Statutory rape, which prohibits sexual intercourse between persons who are 21 years and older and persons younger than 16;
Any offense involving child pornography;
Forcible penetration with a foreign object; and
Additionally, if an individual served time in State prison, that individual would only be eligible for expungement if the underlying crime is one that would qualify for a sentence to serve time in a county prison at the time of filing the petition for expungement.
Who Is Eligible To Have Their Records Expunged In California?
Expungement isn’t available to everyone, only certain individuals can receive this benefit. If you are unsure whether or not you qualify for having your record expunged, talking to a Southern California criminal defense lawyer who can examine your criminal history is a good place to start.
These legal professionals are going to check your history against the following measures:
Your conviction occurred in a state court, not a federal court
You did not go to state prison
You did go to state prison when you could have served your time in county jail if your crimes occurred after Realignment in Proposition 47 was passed
You meet the requirements to be eligible for a certificate of rehabilitation and expungement
You finished your probation or you were able to have your probation terminated early via a petition
You successfully completed all of your conviction requirements such as classes or community service
You are not facing any other charges for a criminal defense
Who May Not Have Their Record Expunged In California?
Those who have any of the following, are not able to have their records expunged:
You are looking at charges for a criminal offense
You are currently on probation for a criminal offense
You are currently serving a sentence for a criminal offense
You are convicted of certain sex crimes against children
When Can Someone Apply?
A person can request an expungement as soon as probation is completed or he/she receives an early termination of probation. Unlike many other legal procedures, expunging a criminal record is a fairly quick process that usually takes one to two months.
While expungement can help with employment and obtaining professional licenses, there are certain things it cannot do, including:
overturn a driver’s license suspension or revocation;
restore gun rights;
end a duty to register as a sexual offender; or
eliminate the conviction from being used toward sentence enhancements under the three-strikes law for any future criminal offenses.
How Does Expungement Work?
To have a record expunged, an individual who meets the above eligibility requirements, as well as the above crime requirements, may petition the State for expungement. In doing so, he/she will need to acquire a copy of his/her criminal record, and submit it for review by the ruling judge.
If all the required elements are met, then, thanks to the new process for expungement, the judge is given no discretion on whether to grant the request and, instead, is required by statute to expunge the individual’s record.
Accordingly, speaking with an experienced criminal defense attorney before beginning the expungement process will serve to ascertain whether a case is eligible for expungement.
What Happens After Your Record is Expunged in California?
There are several benefits to expungement but it doesn’t alleviate all issues that are connected with a criminal conviction in California.
This is what expungement will do:
Adjust the court record to indicate that your case was dismissed.
Provide more flexibility to answer no regarding your conviction when you apply to most jobs. You should answer yes regarding your conviction when you are pursuing a government job. The same is true for professions where it is necessary to have a license, certificate, permit, or any level of security clearance but you can also disclose that you had your conviction expunged.
Unless you are facing trial for another offense, you will be able to testify in court as a witness.
Potentially allow you to get a pardon if your expungement was for a felony.
An expungement in California will not do the following:
Your criminal history will still show your conviction and expungement that the state of California, as well as the FBI, can see.
If your conviction resulted in making it unlawful to have a firearm, expungement doesn’t reinstate that right.
You will still have to register as a sex offender if you were convicted of sex crimes.
If you require a government-issued license you have to indicate that you were convicted of a crime.
Seal your case from the public.
If you are arrested for another crime, your expunged crime can still be used to increase your sentencing.
Licensing agencies can still revoke or deny you a professional license.
The Immigration and Naturalization Service may still consider your conviction when determining your status.
How To Get Help With Expungement In California?
Despite its limitations, individuals who qualify for expungement can improve their quality of life and reclaim their future for the better after a criminal conviction. The Los Angeles criminal defense attorneys at the Manshoory Law Group can provide you with the legal guidance you need to learn about how expungement works and if your case is applicable.
Contact the California criminal defense attorneys at the Manshoory Law Group today to schedule your free case evaluation at (877) 977-7750 today.
As science and technology become more integrated with society, it seems inevitable that fictional crime dramas on television will eventually become reality. In these shows, many accused are convicted on the basis of DNA evidence. What the dramas do not illustrate is that DNA evidence is not the be-all-end-all and that its veracity can be contested and, in some cases, its applicability invalidated.
Retaining the services of an experienced criminal defense attorney can be crucial to negating the effects of this evidence, by persuading the judge or jury that the evidence is false, unreliable, or the like. Recently, California authorities arrested a man on suspicion of being the Golden State Killer, a serial rapist-murderer from a decades-long cold case, based on “Family Tree Forensics” – comparing the DNA collected at the crime scenes with the DNA submitted by family members to various private laboratories, and developing an educated match to the individual who is ultimately accused of committing a crime.
Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA)
DNA is a molecule, present in every organism, which carries the unique genetic instructions used in the growth, development, functioning, and reproduction of that organism. Essentially, DNA is the ultimate fingerprint – identifying information that is unique to every individual. An individual’s DNA is inherent in every aspect of his/her being. Thus, when an individual is at a crime scene, even portions of his/her skin that naturally falls hold DNA information. Law enforcement uses collected DNA to compare it against known samples in the state and federal databases.
Any juvenile convicted or adjudicated for a felony in California;
Any individual convicted or adjudicated of a misdemeanor, if he/she has a prior felony in any state;
Any individual in custody or on any supervised release after a conviction for any California felony committed prior to November 3, 2004;
Any individual currently on any supervised release for any offense, but having a prior felony in any state; and
Any individual is required to register as a sex or arson offender.
Challenging DNA Evidence
When done properly, DNA testing is incredibly accurate. This is because the only real possibility of two people sharing the same DNA is in the case of identical twins. However, to be done properly, the collection of DNA evidence must be done under the proper circumstances, such as when one can obtain a large amount, when there is a clear chain of title, and when the processing laboratory is mistake-free.
This happens, however, in only a few circumstances. In reality, DNA evidence will almost certainly have some degree of ambiguity, and, as a result, can be challenged on any number of factors including the following:
Bad sampling. DNA is collected at the crime scene, which is not a clean environment and can result in the contamination of DNA from other individuals. Further, some collections are less reliable than others, such as that from a door, which will almost certainly contain traces of many individuals.
Improper lab procedures. Some crime laboratories handle many samples at one time. Accordingly, strict procedures are needed to prevent mistakes. However, mistakes do happen, and a DNA sample may be improperly stored, labeled, or analyzed. Additionally, the chain of title – a documentation of the DNA and its possessor every step of the way from collection to courtroom – may be incomplete.
Travelling DNA. Even if a match occurs, it is not dispositive as to whether the accused individual was at the crime scene, as there is no known way to determine how DNA travels. Further, DNA can linger for months after an individual has visited a locale, further clouding the accuracy of the evidence.
Speak to a Criminal Defense Attorney
If you have been arrested on suspicion of committing a crime and DNA evidence will likely be used against you, contact the criminal defense attorneys at Manshoory Law Group, APC as soon as possible. Time is always of the essence in responding to criminal allegations, so it is crucial to avoid delays.
The attorneys at our office have years of experience in criminal defense and can use this to challenge any DNA evidence that the prosecution may intend to use against you. Contact the Los Angeles criminal defense firm today for an initial consultation.
Dealing with law enforcement, whether officers or prosecutors, is a very intimidating experience. Unfortunately for the accused, this is a feature, not a flaw, of the American justice system. In an effort to allow law enforcement to investigate and, if necessary, punish individuals for committing crimes, society has effectively armed law enforcement with tactics that may seem harsh. However, the end result – taking a criminal off the streets, preventing him/her from committing a further crime – is why society allows such tactics.
Nevertheless, our justice system also allows for rights for the criminally accused, and retaining the services of an experienced criminal defense attorney is the best and most effective protector of these rights. Part of the collection of rights available to criminal defendants is the ability to block certain testimony at trial as privileged from disclosure.
One prime example is the confessional privilege. However, a State Senator is introducing a bill hoping to abolish this established right, effectively quashing a long-held legal tradition rooted in the common law. A discussion of the confessional privilege, and the current law in the California Legislature, will follow below.
Senate Bill 360
As mentioned above, an effort is afoot to eliminate the confessional privilege, albeit only in cases involving child abuse or neglect. Current State law, per the Child Abuse and Neglect Reporting Act, requires certain individuals, including clergy, to report to authorities whenever they, in their professional capacity, have knowledge of or observe a child whom the cleric knows or reasonably suspects has been the victim of child abuse or neglect.
An exception is made when the cleric acquires this knowledge or reasonable suspicion during a penitential communication. SB 360 would eliminate that exception.
The Confessional Privilege, Historically
The confessional privilege is a traditional and contemporary rule of evidence that forbids judicial inquiry into certain communications (spoken or otherwise) between clergy and members of their congregation. This privilege, like others, is based on the recognition of certain communication as not subject to otherwise obligatory disclosure. For example, this often applies to communications between lawyers and clients.
Similar to the spousal communication privilege, the confessional privilege exists because society has deemed communication between a cleric and a confessor to be sacrosanct, and above reproach. If, for example, a husband could not confide in his wife without fear of reprisal, the marriage would lose any semblance of trust and, in many cases, fail. In a similar way, the relationship an individual has with leaders in his/her church is granted a level of trust and honor that exempts it from use at trial. Failure to protect this communication would almost certainly result in fewer confessions and the loss of important societal support for many.
It should be noted that this privilege is not completely similar to another form of privileged communication – the attorney-client privilege. The purpose of that privilege is so that a client can receive the best possible legal defense (another time-honored tradition of our legal system). To require an attorney to report communications from his/her client would necessarily mean that the client would have to withhold information from the attorney, information that could exonerate him/her from the charges against him/her.
Speak to a Criminal Defense Attorney
If you have recently been arrested, or are facing an upcoming criminal trial, contact the criminal defense attorneys at Manshoory Law Group, APC as soon as possible. It is never wise to attempt to defend yourself against a criminal charge – even attorneys know this. Not only do prosecutors have many tools at their disposal, but they also have years of experience in convicting individuals.
The attorneys at our office can counter this experience. After an analysis of the circumstances of your crime, we will work to get you the best possible outcome. The attorneys here are available 24/7 to take your call. Contact the Los Angeles criminal defense firm today for an initial consultation.
Is a Confess to a Crime Alone Enough to Convict a Defendant?
When an individual is arrested for committing a crime, he/she is usually brought to a nearby police station for questioning. Unfortunately for the arrestee, the procedure used by law enforcement for questioning a suspect is extremely one-sided. In an attempt to ascertain the events which led to the crime, law enforcement will intimidate, harass, and pressure the arrestee into making a confession. While these actions are completely legal, confessions are sometimes coerced.
Retaining the services of an experienced criminal defense attorney can be crucial to having a coerced confession thrown out at trial. However, even if a judge rules that the confession can be introduced at trial, a legal principle known as corpus delicti is still applicable, which prevents the prosecution from relying exclusively on the confession of the arrestee for conviction, and requires the state to also introduce evidence linking the arrestee with the crime.
Recently, ostensibly in an effort to protect victims of human trafficking, the California Assembly introduced a bill that would allow an individual to report the occurrence of certain crimes, and be granted immunity from arrest, including sexual assault, human trafficking, stalking, robbery, assault, kidnapping, threats, blackmail, extortion, and burglary. A discussion of confessions, and when they cannot be used at trial, will follow below.
What is a Coerced Confession?
In California, all criminal defendants have the right to not be required to be a witness against themselves. In other words, no criminal defendant is required to provide the prosecution with evidence to convict him/her, such as being forced to confess to a crime.
Rather, the prosecution must prove the defendant committed the crime through other evidence. It should be noted that this right concerns the defendant being forced to confess to a crime; there is nothing against the defendant voluntarily confessing to committing a crime.
How can a Confession be Thrown Out?
The issue thus becomes – what is and what is not a voluntary confession?The standard for an involuntary confession is whether law enforcement used tactics that undermined the suspect’s ability to exercise his/her own free will. This is a high standard and a difficult one for a defendant to meet without effective assistance of counsel. The key to establishing an involuntary confession is showing that some sort of improper interrogation tactic overcame the arrestee’s free will.
Evidence that shows an obvious overcoming of the arrestee’s free will includes torture or depriving the arrestee of food and/or water for an extended period of time. Other, less obvious, means which can be used to overcome an arrestee’s free will typically require an inquiry into the circumstances involving the confession.
For example, courts will look at the following factors to ascertain whether an arrestee’s free will was compromised:
Whether law enforcement read the Miranda warnings to the arrestee prior to his/her arrest;
The location of the questioning (a police station is typically considered more intimidating than at the scene of the crime);
The length of the interrogation (the longer the interrogation, the more coercive it will be considered);
Whether the arrestee requested an attorney, and, if so, whether law enforcement honored the request;
Whether the arrestee decided to remain silent, and, if so, whether law enforcement respected that decision;
Who initiated the conversation (a defendant who freely and voluntarily interacts with law enforcement may not be able to show coercion); and
The arrestee’s age, level of maturity, mental/physical health, and experience with the criminal justice system.
As is clear, evidence other than putting pressure on the arrestee must be shown for a judge to rule a confession to be coerced. Speaking with an experienced criminal defense attorney will help to ensure that this evidence is brought to the judge.
Let Your Lawyer Do The Talking
If you have been arrested on suspicion of committing a crime, contact the criminal defense attorneys at Manshoory Law Group, APC as soon as possible. It is important that you resist every attempt to confess to any crime.
The attorneys at our office have years of experience in criminal defense law, including an understanding of your individual rights and responsibilities. If you inadvertently, or under coercion, confessed to committing a crime, we will do our best to mitigate the situation.
The Los Angeles attorneys here are available 24/7 to take your call. Do not wait, contact us today for a case analysis.
Being stopped by police is no joke and can result in arrest and criminal charges if certain facts and actions are present. However, merely engaging with law enforcement is unnerving. What makes the experience so unnerving is the lack of familiarity with the criminal justice system, especially from the point of view of law enforcement.
Law enforcement has a greater depth of understanding of the criminal justice system because they deal in that arena on a daily basis. As a result, most individuals may not know specifically what their rights and responsibilities are. Retaining an experienced criminal defense lawyer can help level the proverbial playing field because he/she is also well versed in this arena, in most cases, also on a daily basis. Looking at the specific circumstances of a stop or conversation with a police officer, many may be unaware whether cooperation must be provided to law enforcement.
To this end, a California law, from the frontier days of the State, maybe get an overhaul. Currently, it is a misdemeanor to refuse to comply with a call for assistance by law enforcement, but a California Assemblyman is looking to repeal that 1872 law. A discussion of law enforcement’s power of arrest, and what cooperation is required to be provided to law enforcement, will follow below.
Why Should You Stay Calm and Cooperate with the Police?
California law allows law enforcement officers to arrest an individual in one of the following situations:
Pursuant to a warrant; or
Without a warrant, if one of the following is true:
The officer has probable cause to believe that the individual has committed an offense in the officer’s presence;
The individual has committed a felony, whether or not in the officer’s presence; or
The officer has probable cause to believe that the individual has committed a felony.
Thus, in cases where there is no warrant for an individual’s arrest unless law enforcement is absolutely certain that the individual has committed a felony, the officer will typically have to rely on probable cause to arrest the individual. This reliance is routinely supported by questioning the individual.
Can you Refuse to Speak to California Police?
It is important to understand that, as the warning set forth in the U.S. Supreme Court case of Miranda v. Arizona, anything said to law enforcement can and will be used against the speaker. Inherent in this statement is the Federal Constitution’s guarantee against self-incrimination – that any individual will not be required to say something which could implicate him/her in a crime. As a result, it is important to understand what is required when interacting with law enforcement.
Miranda also notes that all individuals have the right to remain silent. This right should be exercised as much as possible, although there are times in which this right can be waived, such as in the case of mistaken identity or to provide an alibi.
As an example, if law enforcement is accusing an individual of committing a crime at a specific time and at a specific location, and the individual can prove that he/she was not in the location at that time, speaking to law enforcement may avoid the formal filing of charges against the individual. Nevertheless, it is also important to understand the consequences of exercising this right. As an example, while it is an individual’s right to refuse to provide identification to law enforcement if requested, such refusal may result in an arrest.
Once an arrest is made, however, it is never advisable to speak to anyone without first consulting with a criminal defense attorney. Their understanding of the law will ensure that nothing is said which could act against the interests of the arrestee.
Best Practices When Dealing With the Police
If you have been arrested on suspicion of committing a crime, contact the criminal defense attorneys at Manshoory Law Group, APC as soon as possible. The attorneys at our office have years of experience in criminal defense law, including an understanding of your individual rights and responsibilities. We can advise you of your legally-required responsibilities, as well as what information is not required to be provided to law enforcement.
We are available 24/7 to take your call. Do not wait, contact us today for a case analysis.
We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. Agree
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
