Trusted Criminal Defense Attorneys In Southern California
I agree to receive promotional content and notifications from Manshoory Law Group through email or text message. For further details, kindly refer to our Privacy Policy.
Criminal law classifies crimes partly based on the defendant’s state of mind at the time of the offense. This division between specific intent crimes and general intent crimes changes how a case is handled, what defenses work, and how bad the punishment might be. Anyone facing charges needs to understand this difference.
Understanding Intent in Criminal Law
Criminal law looks at two main things: what someone did (actus reus) and what they were thinking (mens rea). California uses special jury instructions called CALCRIM[1] to explain this. Intent connects someone’s thoughts to their actions when committing a crime. It helps measure how blameworthy they are and affects both the charges they face and their sentence if convicted.
Criminal laws place intent into two main buckets: specific and general intent.
Specific Intent Crimes Explained
For prosecutors to win their case, they must prove two things: that the defendant did the act AND that they had a particular purpose in mind when doing it.
Check the law’s language. Words like “with intent to,” “knowingly,” or “willfully” mean prosecutors have to prove what the defendant was thinking, not just what they did.
Take burglary as an example[2]. Just proving someone entered a building unlawfully isn’t enough. Prosecutors must also show they entered specifically to commit theft or another felony once inside. Without that mental element, it’s not burglary.
Examples of Specific Intent Crimes
Burglary (PC 459): Unlawful entry PLUS intent to commit theft or a felony inside
Robbery[3] (PC 211): Taking property by force or fear, PLUS intent to permanently deprive the owner
Forgery (PC 470): Signing someone else’s nam,e PLUS intent to defraud
Other specific intent vs general intent distinctions appear in crimes such as theft[5], embezzlement, solicitation, conspiracy, and attempted crimes[6].
A criminal defense attorney sometimes uses the memory aid A-SPCF: Attempt crimes, Solicitation, Property felonies, Conspiracy, First-degree murder.
What are Defenses for Specific Intent Crimes?
When the law requires specific intent, these defenses can work:
Showing the prosecutor can’t prove the defendant’s state of mind
Evidence of intoxication that prevented the formation of the proper criminal intent
Mental illness that made forming specific intent crimes impossible
Defense strategy focuses on breaking the link between actions and mental state. Since prosecutors must prove both the act and the intent, creating doubt about either element of the crime can lead to acquittal.
What are General Intent Crimes?
General intent crimes only require proof that the defendant deliberately committed the act, regardless of what they intended to happen as a result.
Prosecutors just need to show that the defendant voluntarily did something against the law. Their reasons or goals don’t matter.
CALCRIM No. 250 covers these crimes, telling jurors to focus only on whether the defendant deliberately did the criminal act[8], not what they hoped would happen.
These offenses focus on the voluntary action rather than the purpose.
Examples of General Intent Crimes
Assault (PC 240)[9]: Just requires an intentional act causing fear of harmful contact
Battery (PC 242): Just requires intentional, harmful, or offensive touching
Rape: Focuses on doing the act without consent, not intent to harm
Many scholars note that specific intent vs general intent can be determined by examining the statutory language. Courts figure out which type applies based on the law’s wording and previous cases.
What are Defenses for General Intent Crimes?
Defending against these charges typically involves:
Proving a lack of voluntary action (unconsciousness, seizure)
Punishment: The former category often comes with harsher penalties
Prosecution Approach: For the more complex cases, prosecutors must prove the defendant’s purpose beyond just doing the act
Why Intent Knowledge Matters for Your Defense
Knowing whether you face specific intent crimes or general intent charges helps build the right defense. This distinction affects everything from evidence to sentencing. California courts keep refining these distinctions through their rulings. The specific intent crimes offer more defense options based on mental state. The general intent focuses mainly on whether the defendant voluntarily did the prohibited act.
If you or someone you know is facing criminal charges, intent matters; our experienced defense attorneys can assess your case and develop effective strategies based on specific intent requirements. Contact us today at (877) 511-7583 for a free consultation.
In criminal law, this defense holds true when someone acts under a false but reasonable belief, therefore influencing their mens rea¹. Whether the accused had the necessary intent to participate in illegal activity takes the front stage. Should the erroneous notion eliminate intent, a conviction could be denied. It is not like a Mistake of Law, though, since courts hardly consider ignorance of the law as a legitimate justification. Analyzing legal tactics in criminal cases depends on an awareness of this difference.
Explaining the Mistake of Fact Defense
Whether someone has criminal intent depends on their act occurring under an erroneous but reasonable assumption regarding a critical fact. This defense of error is applied in circumstances whereby the accused did not deliberatelycommit a crime.
For example, taking another person’s jacket by mistake while thinking it belongs to you lacks the intention of theft. Still, deliberately grabbing it even knowing it belongs to someone else is not allowed.
This case is more successful where conviction depends on establishing intention. When intent to act alone is enough for guilt, its effectiveness is limited. Some offenses do not allow this defense at all, as intent is not required for conviction.
The Role of the Mistake of Fact in Criminal Liability
In criminal law, the mental state² determineswhether an act was intentional or accidental. Many crimes call for proof of purpose, and this defense might refute that by demonstrating the accused lacks understanding of misconduct.
Taking an item while believing it belongs to you differs from knowingly stealing it. One involves an honest mistake, while the other demonstrates criminal intent.
Courts carefully assess fact or law distinctions³. A Mistake of Factcan excuse a crime by negating intent, but a Mistake of Law—claiming ignorance of the law—is rarely accepted. The key difference is whether the misunderstanding affects the ability to form criminal intent.
What is the Mistake of Law Defense?
This defense applies when a person commits a crime due to ignorance or misunderstanding of legal rules. Unlike other defenses that question intent, it argues that the defendant did not realize their actions were illegal.
Courts rarely accept this argument because individuals are expected to know the law. Not realizing that gambling is illegal in a certain state does not exempt someone from penalties. However, in rare cases, it may apply, such as when a government official provides incorrect legal advice that leads to unlawful actions.
In certain legal disputes, mistakes of law defensesare sometimes raised, but generally face strict limitations. Courts often require that the misunderstanding stem from official misinformation rather than personal ignorance of the law.
Do These Defenses Apply to Strict Liability Crimes?
Certain crimes do not require proof of intent; committing the act alone is enough for conviction. These offenses include statutory rape, selling alcohol to minors, and certain environmental violations.
Because mistake-of-fact defenses rely on negating intent, they are usually ineffective in these cases. A store owner who mistakenly sells alcohol to a minor using a fake ID⁴ is still liable—even if they genuinely believed the buyer was of legal age. Strict liability⁵ laws prioritize public safety over individual misunderstandings, making intent irrelevant in most cases.
Criteria for a Valid Mistake of Fact Defense
For this defense to be valid, the mistake must be both reasonable and bona fide (made in good faith). Courts consider whether a typical person in the same situation would have made the same honest mistake and whether it negates criminal intent.
A key factor is the type of crime involved. In specific intent crimes, where proving intent is necessary (e.g., theft or fraud), a mistake of fact can be a strong defense. If someone took another’s property genuinely believing it was theirs, they lacked the required intent for theft⁶.
However, in general intent crimes, where only the intent to act matters (e.g., assault), this defense is harder to use. Mistakenly striking another person under the belief they were an attacker may still lead to guilt, as the intent to strike existed, even if the reasoning was flawed.
Limitations and Challenges of the Mistake of Fact Defense
This defense does not apply when the misunderstanding is unreasonable or irrelevant to the crime. If a defendant’s belief was irrational or negligent, such as assuming an unlocked car was theirs without verifying ownership, the argument is unlikely to succeed.
One major challenge is proving that the mistake was reasonable and made in good faith. The prosecution may argue that the accused should have verified the facts before acting. Courts assess whether a reasonable person would have made the same error under similar circumstances.
Additionally, societal and legal perceptions influence how judges and juries interpret legal defenses in criminal cases. A mistaken belief that aligns with common sense is more likely to be accepted than one that appears reckless. This makes it critical for defendants to present strong evidence supporting their claims.
This defense plays a crucial role in cases where intent matters but comes with strict legal limitations. Successfully arguing it requires proving a reasonable and good-faith belief. However, courts carefully evaluate the circumstances, and a weak argument can lead to conviction.
Legal representation is essential in navigating a defense in criminal law cases. Our criminal defense attorneys at Manshoory Law can assess whether a defense of a mistake is applicable and build a strong case. Without proper legal guidance, defendants risk misinterpreting the law and facing severe penalties.
Consult a qualified lawyer today to build the strongest defense and secure the best possible outcome.
Protective orders and restraining orders are similar in that they are intended to protect an individual from the harmful conduct of another, but in California, they serve different purposes. Many people use the terms protective order and restraining order interchangeably, yet the two orders are different, separate, and distinct in the law in both criminal and civil matters.
If you or your loved ones must be kept safe from someone else, you might need a protective or restraining order as per your circumstances.
Criminal vs. Civil Orders
The first and main difference between protective order vs restraining order lies in the legal context[1] in which they are derived.
Protective orders are issued by criminal cases and have to do mostly with domestic violence and other related forms of abuse and are enforced by the prosecution.
On the other hand, restraining orders are filed in civil court and can be used in harassment, stalking, or disputes between individuals who do not have a close relationship.
Both orders can severely limit contact, communication, or physical proximity between individuals, but the legal process to obtain and enforce them is different.
What is a Protective Order?
A protective order in California is a court-issued directive designed to prevent harm or threat from an individual, often in situations involving domestic violence cases, abuse, or criminal activity. These orders are typically part of a criminal case[2], ensuring that the accused cannot contact or set about protecting mortals.
Such orders may be made out at different levels of legal proceedings, such as during an investigation or after a conviction, depending on the severity of the threat posed.
California law provides various forms or types[3]of protective orders, including emergency protective orders, which law enforcement policemen can receive to provide prompt protection, and temporary protective orders which remain in place until a formal hearing is conducted.
What is a Restriction Order?
Restraining order is a court order that legally restrains a person from approaching, threatening, harassing, or engaging in any violent act against another person. Such an order can come from a broader set of circumstances, as opposed to a protective order, which must be obtained through civil court.
A restraining order in California is divided into several categories. These include:
Domestic violencerestraining orders protect against abuse by a spouse, former partner, or family member.
Civil harassment restraining orders[4]apply when the restrained person is not a close family member but presents a threat through continuing harassment or threats.
Protective Order vs Restraining Order: Application Process and Requirements
The process of receiving a protective order is different. Subsequently, law enforcement officers and prosecutors almost always petition for criminal protective orders in such cases of domestic violence or threats. These orders are, as a result, issued most of the time automatically when such a case appears before a criminal court.
On the other hand, restraining orders require the person seeking protection to file a petition[5] in civil court. The petitioner must present evidence of harassment, abuse, or threats and appear before the court. If the judge believes the claims are valid, a temporary restraining order may be issued until a formal hearing determines whether a long-term order is needed.
Duration of Protective Order and Restraining Order in California
In California, theduration of protective[6] order vs restraining ordersvaries based on the type of order:
Emergency Protective Orders (EPOs): These are issued by law enforcement and usually last up to 7 calendar days.
Temporary Restraining Orders (TROs): Such orders last until the court hearing, usually within 20-25 days.
Restraining Orders After Hearing: These can stay up to 5 years. If no end date is specified, the last 3 years can be extended.
Violating A Restraining Order or Protective Order in California
Violating a protective or restraining order in California is a serious offense with significant consequences. The following are the principal points:
Misdemeanor Violation: Violation of a restriction order is usually a misdemeanor punishable by a fine, probation, and/or jail time. The consequences may be up to 1 year in the county jail and a fine of up to $1,000[7].
Felony Violation: If the violation involves violence, threats of violence, or injury, or if you have previous convictions for violating restraining orders. Violation punishments such as felonies can extend to 3 years in jail or prison and a fine of up to $1,000.
Protective Order vs Restraining Order: Can They Be Modified or Extended?
Under some conditions, protective and restraining orders can be changed or extended. If the situation changes, a party may seek a modification of the order so that the terms of the order are changed. This may mean changing restrictions in place on contact, residence, or communication.
For those who want to be protected further, restriction orders can be extended beyond the date of their expiration. The application for extension must be filed before the current order expires, andthe petitioner must show a continued threat or risk. The court will consider the need to extend the order based on the evidence presented.
How to Fight a Protective Order or Restriction Order in California?
If you believe the court order is unjust or unjustified, then you can appeal. Here is how you do it:
Gather Evidence: Collect all evidence that proves that the allegations brought against you are false or overstated.
Follow the Court Order Until the Hearing: Even if you believe the order is unfair, violating it before your court date can lead to criminal charges. Strictly comply with all terms, including no-contact provisions, stay-away distances, and firearm restrictions.
File a Response (Form DV-120 for Domestic Violence Cases): If you receive a Domestic Violence Restraining Order (DVRO)[8], you should file a Response to Request for Domestic Violence Restraining Order (DV-120) before your court hearing.
Knowing the difference between protective and restraining orders allows individuals to make good decisions. Although both are safety orders, their application, duration, and enforcement are totally different.
Consider the irresistible allure of getting a golden ticket to adulthood, granting you access to a world of exclusive privileges and freedoms reserved for individuals who have reached the legal age.
It tantalizes many people with the opportunity to obtain alcohol, enter clubs, or even secure employment prospects that would otherwise appear unattainable. However, concealed beneath the outward appearance of these forged credentials exists a complex network of legal and personal hazards, waiting to entrap those who are unaware.
Within this comprehensive guide, we’ll delve into what happens if you get caught with a fake ID, examining the repercussions, enduring ramifications, and possible strategies for individuals ensnared within its intricate snare.
Come and join us as we look into the reality that lies behind the charm, as well as the harsh truth that awaits those who have the courage to traverse this risky journey!
Understanding Fake IDs
Fake IDs might seem like a convenient bypass to adulthood, an enticing route for underage individuals seeking access to activities and privileges restricted to those who meet the legal age criteria.
They are commonly pursued by individuals desiring to purchase alcohol, enter clubs, or even obtain employment that mandates a minimum age requirement. However, these documents are not merely innocuous plastic items; they carry a range of legal and personal hazards that can have a profound effect on an individual’s life.
Legal Consequences: Penalties for Possession or Use of a Fake ID
But what happens if you get caught with a fake ID? Well, the consequences of being caught in possession of a fake ID can greatly differ based on geographical location and the specifics surrounding the incident. However, in the majority of instances, the penalties can be quite harsh[1].
You might face substantial monetary penalties, receive a verdict of community service, or potentially serve a period of jail time. Indeed, the prospect of imprisonment looms large, particularly for individuals who repeatedly engage in such offenses or employ fake identification to perpetrate further illegal activities.
The consequences of being caught with a fake ID spread well beyond the boundaries of financial penalties and judicial proceedings; they have the potential to directly hinder an individual’s capacity to operate a vehicle. For instance, vehicle penal code 13004 in California[2] considers driving with a fake identification card a misdemeanor and can lead to severe consequences.
For numerous individuals, the mere notion of having their driver’s license suspended or taken away deeply affects their sense of self-reliance and freedom of movement. The loss of driving privileges can ripple through daily life, affecting everything from commuting to work or school to running simple errands.
When it comes to dealing with the consequences of possessing or using a fake ID, age is not merely a trivial detail—it is a pivotal element that can profoundly impact the trajectory of one’s future. For underage people, the potential repercussions can be especially overwhelming. From increased punishments to the possibility of facing juvenile court hearings, the future is filled with unpredictability and anxiety.
On the other hand, adults may encounter a distinct array of difficulties, as the consequences of their actions possess greater significance. Although they may not benefit from the innocence associated with youth, they still contend with the repercussions of damaged reputations and limited prospects.
Is Having a Fake ID a Felony
An important question that comes to mind is, is having a fake ID a felony? Whether the possession of a fake ID card is classified as a felony primarily relies on the legislation governing that specific state. While the majority of instances are charged with a misdemeanor[3], there are certain circumstances where this may not apply.
Engaging in additional criminal activities through the use of a fake identification or possessing a prior record of similar offenses can elevate the offense to a felony[4]. It is crucial to have a comprehensive understanding of the legal framework and potential repercussions within your jurisdiction in order to make well-informed choices. For that, the best advice is to contact a qualified Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney.
Long-term Implications of Buying Fake ID
The repercussions resulting from being charged with a fake identification extend far beyond the legal consequences, exerting a significant influence on your future opportunities[5].
Consider this: being found guilty of possessing or utilizing a fake identification card leaves an enduring mark on your personal record, hounding you persistently. It has the potential to endanger your prospects of securing your desired employment, gaining acceptance into educational institutions, or getting professional certifications.
Employers, educational institutions, and licensing boards regularly carry out thorough examinations of individuals’ backgrounds[6], meaning that the commission of a fake ID offense can act as a warning sign, indicating a potential absence of ethical behavior or accountability.
This isn’t solely about the immediate repercussions; it pertains to the cascading impact that can have long-term ramifications on one’s trajectory in life.
Legal Defenses and Mitigation
Thankfully, there are options available if you are confronted with charges related to buying fake IDs. Legal defenses and methods of mitigation exist that can reduce the consequences associated with the offense.
It is possible that your intentions in getting the fake identification were not for illicit purposes, or there may have been procedural mistakes in the acquisition of evidence. An experienced Los Angeles DUI Lawyer can investigate these possibilities and advocate for the most favorable resolution.
In certain instances, individuals may qualify for diversion programs or plea agreements that present an alternative to conventional sentencing. Such programs afford chances for rehabilitation and redemption, enabling individuals to gain insights from their errors and progress in their lives.
In conclusion
Being apprehended with a fake identification is no trivial issue. It constitutes a grave offense that carries the potential for life-changing ramifications. By considering the potential ramifications on both your personal and professional life and knowing what happens if you get caught with a fake ID, it becomes crucial to thoroughly evaluate the consequences before taking any risks.
It is important to bear in mind that there are no quick fixes or shortcuts when it comes to transitioning into adulthood. This process entails navigating through a series of hurdles and openings, and resorting to buying fake IDs as a means to bypass regulations only hinders your progress.
Prior to contemplating obtaining a forged document, take into account the potential ramifications and assess if it is truly worthwhile. Ultimately, it is more advisable to abide by legal principles and construct a future grounded in sincerity and ethical behavior.
We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. Agree
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
