Trusted Criminal Defense Attorneys In Southern California
I agree to receive promotional content and notifications from Manshoory Law Group through email or text message. For further details, kindly refer to our Privacy Policy.
If you’ve heard the terms “Medicaid fraud” and “medical fraud,” you might wonder what they really mean — and who can actually get into trouble for them.
These aren’t just technical mistakes or billing errors. They’re serious offenses that can bring criminal charges, steep penalties, and even jail time.
As long as you’re a health care provider, a billing clerk, or a business owner in the medical field, it’s important to know where the line is and what’s at stake.
What Is Medicaid Fraud?
Medicaid fraud happens when someone tries to get money from the Medicaid program by lying or cheating the system.
Medicaid is a joint state and federal government program designed to help people with low incomes get medical care. Because it uses taxpayer money, it’s tightly monitored.
Here are some common examples of Medicaid fraud:
Billing for services that were never provided.
Performing unnecessary tests just to bill more.
Charging Medicaid for expensive procedures but delivering cheaper ones.
Accepting kickbacks for patient referrals.
Overbilling for durable medical equipment like wheelchairs or walkers.
States have their own medicaid fraud control units (MFCUs) that specifically look for fraud and take action. These fraud control units, MFCUs, work with federal agencies and local investigators to catch wrongdoers and recover stolen funds.
If you’re part of a state medicaid agency, you’re also under administrative rules and audits. Failing to follow administrative requirements, even by accident, can sometimes raise red flags. That’s why knowing the rules is key to keeping your practice safe.
What Is Medical Fraud (and How Is It Different)?
Medical fraud is a broader term that covers any type of fraud in the healthcare system — not just Medicaid.
It often involves private insurance companies, Medicare, or even patients lying to get care or benefits they’re not entitled to.
Health care providers inflating bills for insured patients.
Unlike Medicaid fraud, which focuses on cheating a government program, medical fraud also targets private businesses and insurance companies. Both fall under the bigger umbrella of health care fraud, and both can lead to serious charges.
So why does the difference matter? Because there are different laws applied, and the penalties can vary.
For example, the medicaid fraud control units are focused solely on Medicaid cases, while private insurers might hire investigators or work with law enforcement separately.
Who Can Be Charged with Medicaid Fraud?
You might think only doctors or hospitals get charged with Medicaid fraud — but that’s not the case. Anyone who knowingly helps commit fraud can face charges.
People who can be charged include:
Physicians and nurses: They can face charges for billing Medicaid for fake, unnecessary, or inflated treatments, or for falsifying records to get higher payments.
Office managers and billing staff: These employees handle claims and paperwork. If they alter codes, misstate services, or knowingly submit false information, they can also be held responsible.
Owners of clinics, labs, or nursing homes: Business owners who approve, encourage, or ignore fraudulent billing practices can be charged for directing or enabling fraud schemes.
Patients: Medicaid recipients who lie about income, medical conditions, or household information to qualify, or misuse their benefits, can also face serious fraud charges.
Investigators will often look at the whole chain of people involved. If you sign off on claims, even if you didn’t directly handle the paperwork, you can still be held responsible if the claims are fraudulent.
Because the federal agencies and the medicaid fraud control units work closely to investigate and prosecute, it’s important to get legal help right away if you’re accused. Speaking with an experienced criminal defense lawyer is one of the smartest first steps you can take.
Penalties for Medicaid Fraud
The penalties for Medicaid fraud can be severe. Both state and federal laws apply, and they don’t go easy on offenders.
Here’s what you might face if convicted:
Fines: These can reach into the hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars.
Restitution: You may have to pay back every penny stolen.
Prison time: Jail sentences can range from months to years, depending on the amount and intent.
Loss of license: Medical professionals may lose their ability to practice permanently.
Bans from government programs: Being excluded from Medicaid, Medicare, and other programs can end a medical career.
Even administrative actions, like failing to follow administrative requirements, can result in heavy fines and loss of your ability to bill Medicaid. These penalties aren’t just a slap on the wrist — they’re life-changing.
Common Legal Defenses in Medicaid Fraud Cases
If you’re accused of Medicaid fraud, don’t panic. There are defenses that can help you fight the charges.
Some of the most common defenses include:
Lack of intent: Fraud requires intent. If you made an honest mistake, like a coding error or misunderstanding a rule, you might avoid criminal charges.
Insufficient evidence: Prosecutors have to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt. If the evidence is weak, the case could fall apart.
Compliance with rules: Showing that you followed state medicaid agency rules and administrative requirements can strengthen your defense.
Improper investigation: If the medicaid fraud control unit or other investigators violated your rights during the process, evidence may be thrown out.
The right criminal defense lawyer can help you build the strongest possible case and protect your future. Acting quickly is crucial.
How to Prevent Medicaid Fraud Allegations
The best way to deal with Medicaid fraud? Don’t get caught in it in the first place.
Here are some practical steps to help you avoid allegations:
Train your staff: Make sure everyone knows what’s legal and what’s not. Provide regular updates on billing rules and compliance.
Audit your records: Review your claims and billing regularly to catch errors before the medicaid fraud control units do.
Keep clear documentation: Always document patient care and keep detailed records to back up your claims.
Consult experts: Work with lawyers or compliance officers who understand Medicaid rules.
Be transparent: If you find a mistake, report it and fix it quickly to show good faith.
Even in places like the District of Columbia, where oversight can be especially strict, taking these steps can save you a lot of trouble.
With so many moving parts — from billing for services to meeting administrative requirements — keeping your practice clean is worth the effort.
Remember, medicaid fraud control units are always watching. Staying vigilant helps protect you, your staff, and your patients from devastating consequences.
Stay Informed and Protect Yourself
Both Medicaid fraud and medical fraud are serious crimes with harsh penalties. Knowing the difference and understanding who can be charged is your first step to staying safe.
Whether you work in nursing homes, run a clinic, or handle billing, staying compliant with Medicaid and other programs is essential.
Keeping yourself informed, training your team, and staying transparent are the best ways to keep your practice and reputation intact. Fraud accusations don’t just cost money — they can cost careers. Stay proactive and protect your future.
San Bernardino is one of the largest cities in the Inland Empire, and it faces unique legal challenges. While every city has its issues, knowing what charges are most common here helps you stay informed and prepared if you ever find yourself in a difficult situation.
This post breaks down the data behind local crime, compares San Bernardino to state and national averages, and explains what you should know if you’re charged.
At Manshoory Law Group, we use our deep local experience to guide clients through even the most complex criminal cases, turning confusion into a clear plan.
Crime in San Bernardino: What the Numbers Show
The numbers tell the real story of what you’re up against.
The city-wide crime rate is 44 crimes for every 1,000 residents. For you, that means a 1 in 23 chance of becoming a victim of any crime. More than 96% of other California communities are safer.
Property crime is a huge part of the problem. Your chance of being a victim of property crime here is 1 in 30. And it’s not just minor stuff. The city has one of the highest rates of motor vehicle theft in the nation.
The violent crime rate is also one of the country’s highest. Your chance of being a victim of violence is 1 in 91. The state average is 1 in 197. That gap is massive. And yes, this includes a murder rate that is higher than most other U.S. cities.
How San Bernardino Compares to National Crime Rates
The picture gets even clearer when you put San Bernardino next to the rest of the country.
The city’s overall crime rate is 2% higherthan the national average.
Violent crime rates are 220.7% higher. This means they are more than triple what you see elsewhere.
Property crime rates are 51% higher.
This isn’t a small problem. Economic pressure and the city’s role as a huge transportation hub create a tough environment for law enforcement and residents. When you are charged here, you are part of a system dealing with a massive number of cases.
Common Criminal Charges We Handle in San Bernardino
These numbers become real police reports and criminal charges every day. From what we see fighting in the San Bernardino courts, these are the charges that fill the dockets.
DUI Offenses (VC 23152)
San Bernardino is a commuter city, and the freeways are patrolled heavily. A DUI arrest is very common. A first-time DUI is a misdemeanor, but don’t let that fool you. You’re still looking at jail time, big fines, and a suspended license. If you have prior convictions or someone was hurt in the incident, it immediately becomes a felony DUI, and the stakes are much, much higher.
Drug Possession & Distribution (HS 11350 & 11351)
California drug laws are a maze. Simple possession of a controlled substance (HS 11350) is often a misdemeanor. But police have a lot of discretion. If they decide you had the intent to sell, they’ll charge you with a felony under HS 11351. They make that call based on things like how much of the drug you had or if you had a scale. Their opinion can be the difference between a fine and prison.
Assault & Battery (PC 240 & 245(a)(1))
Simple assault and battery are misdemeanors. But the real problem here is aggravated assault under Penal Code 245(a)(1). Assault with a deadly weapon. A “deadly weapon” can be almost anything in a fight, not just a gun or knife. This is a felony, and it makes up a huge portion of the local violent crime stats.
Domestic Violence (PC 273.5)
In these cases, the phone call to the police is often enough. Once an accusation of domestic violence is made, an arrest is almost certain. If the alleged victim has any kind of visible injury—even a scratch—you will be charged with a felony for corporal injury to a spouse. A conviction means jail, probation, a year-long class, and a lifetime ban on owning a firearm.
Theft & Burglary (PC 487 & 459)
There’s a big difference here. Grand theft (PC 487) is stealing something worth more than $950. But burglary (PC 459) is about intent. It’s entering a building with the intent to commit a theft or any felony inside. You don’t have to actually steal anything. If they can convince a jury you intended to steal when you walked in, that’s the crime. And it’s a felony.
Juvenile Offenses (WIC 602)
When your kid is the one in trouble, the stakes feel even higher. The juvenile system is built for rehabilitation, not punishment like in adult court. But a conviction—called an “adjudication”—can still create huge roadblocks for college and future jobs. The goal is always to secure a real second chance, fighting to have records sealed so one mistake doesn’t define a young person’s life.
Expungements (PC 1203.4)
There is life after a conviction. A call to the court to dismiss your past conviction. It doesn’t erase your record, but it lets you legally and honestly say you were not convicted of that crime on most job applications. It’s a key tool for a fresh start.
Why Local Legal Representation Matters in San Bernardino
In a place like San Bernardino, having a local lawyer isn’t just an advantage; it’s a necessity.
Every courthouse has its own culture and unwritten rules. The San Bernardino Superior Court is an overloaded, fast-paced system. An out-of-town lawyer won’t know the prosecutors. They won’t know the judges’ tendencies. This is a home-field advantage, and you need it on your side.
They know the process. From the first day in court—the arraignment—to the pre-trial negotiations where cases are often won or lost, they know the procedures that work here.
They know the people. Knowing which Deputy District Attorney is more likely to make a fair deal—and which ones aren’t—is critical information. That’s not in a law book. It’s learned from experience.
They know the stakes. They know what a San Bernardino jury is likely to do. They know what kind of plea bargain is a good deal and what is a complete waste of your time. This knowledge is leverage.
Why San Bernardino Clients Trust Manshoory Law Group
Available 24/7: We know arrests happen at 3 a.m. We’re here when you need us.
Former Prosecutor’s Insight: Our background as prosecutors means we know how the other side thinks and how they build their cases. It’s how we find the weaknesses.
10+ Years in SoCal Courts: We have a deep, proven history of defending clients in San Bernardino and across Southern California.
Multilingual Staff: We are ready to serve everyone in our diverse community.
Personalized, Results-Driven Strategies: Your case is not a file number to us. We build a defense strategy for you and your situation.
Arrested in San Bernardino? Contact Us Today.
Just call to set something up. Legal trouble moves fast. The prosecution is already building its case. So should your defense.
Our office is right here in the community. Come see us in person, or we can set up a virtual meeting online if that works better for you.
Get immediate help from our team now.
San Bernardino Criminal Defense FAQs
What are the most common arrests in San Bernardino?
Besides DUI and domestic violence, the two big ones are aggravated assault and motor vehicle theft. Property crime and violent crime drive most of the arrests.
What court handles my criminal charges in San Bernardino?
Criminal cases are heard at the San Bernardino District of the Superior Court of California, located at 247 West Third Street.
Is it possible to reduce or dismiss charges locally?
Yes, that's the job. An attorney can file a motion to have a case dismissed if the police violated your rights. Or we can negotiate with the prosecutor to get a charge reduced—like a felony down to a misdemeanor.
Can I meet with a lawyer online or after hours?
Of course. We offer virtual consultations and we are available 24/7. Trouble doesn't stick to a 9-to-5 schedule. Neither do we.
How long will it take to resolve my case?
Anyone who gives you a quick answer is not being honest. A simple misdemeanor might take weeks. A complex felony trial can take more than a year. It depends on the facts of your case.
Superior Court of California County of San Bernardino. (2025). Welcome to the Superior Court of San Bernardino. Retrieved from https://sanbernardino.courts.ca.gov/
If someone told you falsifying documents was no big deal, they were wrong. It can get you into serious trouble fast. If you’ve been accused or you’re worried about what counts as a crime here, you’re in the right place.
Falsifying documents can be either a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on what you did and why.
Some types of forged documents carry harsher criminal penalties.
You can defend yourself with the help of a criminal defense attorney if you’re falsely accused.
Proving intent to defraud is a key part of these cases.
State laws vary, so penalties and defenses depend on where you are.
What Counts as Falsifying Documents?
Not every mistake on paperwork is a crime. But falsification of documents happens when you knowingly change, create, or use a document with the intent to deceive someone. It’s considered a type of white collar crime, often tied to fraud, forgery, or false reporting.
Some common examples include:
Altering dates or amounts on business records to hide losses.
Submitting false statements on a loan application.
Creating a false document like a fake medical note or fake ID.
Forging signatures on contracts or checks.
Making a false entry in official records to benefit yourself.
It doesn’t even have to be about money. Even a forged school transcript or fake government form can count if you intended to trick someone into believing it was real. The type of documentmatters too — falsifying a government record is often treated more seriously than a personal note.
Is Falsifying Documents a Felony Crime?
So, is falsifying documents a felony? That depends on the document, the amount of harm caused, and your intent. In many cases, it can be a felony, especially if you forged official records, caused significant financial loss, or tried to scam a government agency.
For example:
Creating or using a fake driver’s license can carry felony charges.
Changing numbers on tax returns can be a felony.
Falsely altering property deeds is almost always a felony.
But sometimes it’s a misdemeanor instead. If the falsehood is minor and didn’t hurt anyone financially, it might carry lighter penalties. Keep in mind, though, that even a misdemeanor can still mean jail time, fines, and a criminal record.
Penalties for Falsifying Documents
If you’re found guilty of falsifying, you’re looking at some pretty steep consequences. Criminal penalties vary depending on your state’s laws, but here’s what’s typically at stake:
Jail or prison time — from a few months to several years for a felony.
Those are usually harsher than for private documents. Also, law enforcement often treats crimes that involve an intent to defraud more seriously than a simple mistake.
Even something like altering a date on a form might seem harmless, but it can still violate state laws if done knowingly. The bigger the fraud or the more official the document, the bigger the punishment.
Common Defenses to Forged Documents Charges
If you’ve been accused of using or creating forged documents, don’t panic — there are defenses you can use. Working with an experienced criminal defense attorney can help you figure out the best strategy.
Some possible defenses include:
No intent to defraud — You made a mistake or didn’t realize the document was false.
Lack of knowledge — You didn’t know the documents in question were altered or fake.
Duress — Someone forced you to falsify or use the false document.
Insufficient evidence — Prosecutors can’t prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you falsified anything.
Prosecutors need to show you had the intent todeceive. If you can show you didn’t have that intent, the charges may not stick.
What to Do If You’re Accused of Falsifying Documents
Getting accused of falsification of documents can feel overwhelming, but you have options. The worst thing you can do is ignore it or try to explain yourself to police without help.
Here’s what to do:
Don’t talk to law enforcement without your lawyer present.
Gather any paperwork that shows your side of the story.
Stay off social media — anything you post can be used against you.
Follow your lawyer’s advice and keep detailed records of everything.
It’s tempting to think you can explain it away, but prosecutors will use your own words against you if you’re not careful. Having the right legal help can make all the difference between a conviction and having the case dropped.
Protect Yourself If You’re Facing Charges
Falsifying documents isn’t something you want to handle alone. The stakes are high, and a conviction can follow you for life. If you’ve been accused, work with a trusted criminal defense attorney who knows the law in your state and can protect your rights.
Take action right away — the sooner you get help, the better your chances of resolving the case on the best terms possible.
No. Sometimes it’s a misdemeanor, especially if the harm caused is small and the document isn’t official. But if you forged something serious, like a public record or financial statement, it’s more likely to be treated as a felony.
Can I go to jail for changing a date on a form?
Yes, you can — if you changed it on purpose to deceive someone, that’s a crime. Even something that seems minor, like changing a date, can violate the law if it was done with intent to defraud.
What if I didn’t know the document was fake?
If you genuinely didn’t know the document you used was false, that can be a valid defense. The law usually requires that you knowingly use or create a false document to be guilty of falsifying.
You hear about them on the news, maybe a friend whispers the term in a group chat, and suddenly the words Ghost Gun pop up in your head.
You wonder, “Is it really a big deal?” Short answer? Yes.
What Is a Ghost Gun?
A ghost gun is a firearm that skips the normal factory trail. It starts life as unfinished frames and receivers, parts that can be purchased online or at a swap meet without a criminal background check.
Using basic tools like a drill press, hand tools, or even a 3D printer, individuals can complete these parts at home. Because these firearms typically lack serial numbers, they are difficult for law enforcement to trace, placing them in what’s often referred to as the “gray market.”
Unlike a store-bought pistol, a ghost build doesn’t move through the federal regulation pipeline. The parts ship straight to your door. You handle the rest.
That secrecy boosts its appeal to hobbyists who crave DIY projects—but it also raises red flags for law enforcement agencies worried about undetectable firearms showing up at crime scenes.
A quick timeline helps:
1968: Congress passes the Gun Control Act, also known as the Control Act of 1968. This law creates the foundation for modern gun laws, requiring serial numbers on firearms and regulating their sale, ownership, and tracking.
Today: With cheaper tech and access to 3D printing files or router kits, almost anyone can build a working ghost gun at home—often in just a weekend—without going through a criminal background check or official paperwork.
So, the core test is simple: if it sidesteps a serial stamp and official paperwork, you’re likely looking at a ghost build.
Are Ghost Guns Legal?
Rules depend on state law and evolving federal law. Some states treat ghost builds like any other gun: if you’re a lawful owner, no permission is needed. Others close the door entirely, requiring engraving or banning self-made firearms outright.
In 2024, a fresh federal regulation expanded the definition of “firearm” to include unfinished frames. That shift pulled many build kits back under gun regulated status.
Every year brings a new court battle. One headline case, known as the Supreme Court ghost gun ruling (decided in 2023 and revisited in 2025), allowed enforcement of the ATF rule while lower courts fight about its reach. The decision didn’t outlaw all homemade guns, but it showed the justices take the threat seriously.
Why Ghost Guns Are a Legal Concern
No traceability: Ghost guns don’t have serial numbers, so police can’t link them to a buyer or seller. This makes it harder to solve crimes or track how a weapon ended up at a scene.
Easier transfers: Since there’s no required criminal background check, anyone—including someone banned from owning a gun—can buy or trade a kit privately with no paper trail.
Patchwork rules: One county may allow builds, the next may not. Travelers get caught off guard crossing borders.
Public safety fears: Stories of ghost builds in school shootings push lawmakers toward stricter gun laws.
Regulatory whiplash: Each new court or agency action flips requirements, leaving honest hobbyists guessing what the law requires
What Happens If You’re Caught With a Ghost Gun?
Picture getting pulled over for a broken taillight. An officer sees a firearm on your passenger seat. If that pistol has no serial number—and you’re in a jurisdiction that bans them—you face multiple charges in seconds.
Common counts include:
Possession of an unregistered firearm under the Gun Control Act (federal): Ghost guns without serial numbers may be treated as unregistered firearms, a serious federal offense that can lead to felony charges and up to 10 years in prison.
Possession of a prohibited weapon under local statutes: If your state law bans ghost guns or requires serialization, just having one—even at home—can result in criminal charges, especially if it was made after the ban.
Transportation of an untraceable weapon across state lines: Moving a ghost gun into a state where it’s illegal or lacks proper markings can trigger federal law violations and possibly lead to trafficking charges.
Penalties vary. A first violation can bring hefty fines, felony records, and even prison. Repeat offenders risk stiffer sentences.
A related supreme court ghost gun case from 2024 upheld a five-year federal sentence for trafficking unnumbered pistols across three states. Courts use that benchmark often.
Beyond prison, you’ll face:
Property seizure: Officers can take the gun plus the tools used to build it.
Long-term loss of rights: A felony blocks future firearm ownership under federal law.
Career fallout: Security-sensitive jobs may vanish overnight.
How to Defend Against Ghost Gun Charges
When charges drop, time matters. You need a battle plan and a seasoned criminal defense lawyer who knows self-made firearm cases inside out. Solid defenses include:
Challenging intent: Prosecutors must show you knowingly built or owned an untraceable weapon. If a friend left the gun in your glove box without telling you, that muddies the intent.
Questioning classification: Was the part legally a firearm? Prior to the latest rule, many 80-percent frames were considered raw metal, not guns. Your lawyer can attack unclear definitions.
Fourth Amendment fights: If police lacked probable cause, the court can toss evidence. No gun equals no case.
Grandfather clauses: Some states allow earlier builds if you mark them within a grace period. Proof of timely engraving helps.
Selective enforcement: Targeted policing—like seizing ghost builds only from one demographic—can violate equal-protection rights.
Each argument needs records, photos, purchase receipts, and expert testimony on firearms frames. Act fast, gather paperwork, and hand everything to counsel.
To learn more, watch the video where our attorney Shaheen Manshoory explains how to deal with ghost gun charges.
Preventive Tips: How to Stay Within the Law
You don’t want that jailhouse orange. Follow these steps to lower risk:
Check local rules first. Laws shift quickly. Call your sheriff’s office or read your state’s firearms code before ordering kits.
Engrave early. If allowed, mark your build with unique serial numbers within the window set by lawmakers.
Keep receipts. Document every part purchase, including lower receivers, jigs, and tools.
Store safely. Lock completed weapons in a safe. That keeps curious teens and burglars away, reducing chances of misuse.
Know travel limits. Crossing into a state that bans ghost builds can turn an ordinary road trip into a felony stop.
Stay updated. Track federal regulation changes and agency notices. Rules from the bureau of alcohol tobacco can change with little warning.
Avoid gray-market forums. Buying unfinished kits through anonymous channels heightens scrutiny. Choose licensed sellers when possible.
Consider traditional purchases. A standard shop sale requires a criminal background check, but it also protects you from surprise legal headaches.
Key Takeaway Checklist
Action
Why It Matters
Verify gun laws before you buy
Avoid instant illegality
Mark the frame
Meets many state engraving mandates
Keep build photos
Proves your timeline if new bans appear
Consult a pro
A quick phone call can save you thousands
Ghost builds sound cool on a YouTube tutorial, but they pack real-world legal heat. Stick to clear rules, mark your parts, and talk to a lawyer if you get a knock on the door. That one step can separate a hobby from a nightmare. Stay informed, build smart, and keep your record clean.
In high-stress situations where your safety—or the safety of someone else—is at risk, knowing your legal rights can make all the difference. California law does allow individuals to use force in self-defense, but only under specific circumstances. Misunderstanding when and how you can legally defend yourself can lead to serious criminal charges.
In this guide, we’ll break down the core principles of self-defense in California, including how “stand your ground” and “Castle Doctrine” laws apply, what constitutes justifiable force, and when these laws offer legal protection. Whether you’ve faced a threat or are simply looking to understand your rights, this article will help clarify what the law allows—and where the limits lie.
What are the California Self Defense Laws?
Self-defense is the act of using force to defend yourself or someone else. Using force against people is normally a crime. When you claim self-defense as a legal defense for your actions, you are admitting that you committed the crime, but did so only to defend yourself. This is a form of affirmative defense[1].
California self defense laws allow you to use force, up to and including lethal force, to defend yourself or other people. This means that if you have a reasonable belief that someone presents an imminent danger or you are in danger of being killed, you may use proportionate force to stop the threat.
Shortly, Yes. Self defense laws in California explicitly state that if you are in immediate danger, you do not have any obligation to retreat according to Penal Code 198.5[2]. Even if retreat is available and appears to be a safer option, you have the right of self-defense and are legally entitled to stand your ground against an attacker. This is the opposite of ‘Duty to Retreat’ self-defense rules. In states with a ‘Duty to Retreat’ doctrine[3], victims of violent crimes[4]are obliged to attempt any available escapes before defending themselves with force.
For example, if you are walking on the street and someone threatens you with a weapon, assaults you, or otherwise illegally uses force against you, California laws of self-defense do not require you to run away or leave the area. If you are somewhere you are entitled to be, like a public area, then you can use the necessary force to remain in that place without becoming the victim of a violent crime.
In some circumstances, you may even pursue an attacker if it can reasonably be deemed necessary to prevent their attempted crime.
Is California a “Castle Doctrine” State?
Yes. California follows the Castle Doctrine, which provides additional legal protections when defending your home. In California, like many other states, your right to stand your ground applies within your own home with additional protections. Most significantly, there is a legal presumption that you feared imminent serious injury or death. This legal principle is known as the Castle Doctrine[5].
The specifics of this California self-defense gun law differ from state to state. In California, the Castle Doctrine only applies within your home itself, not all of your property. In other words, it does not apply in your yard, driveway, and other outdoor areas.
This means that if an intruder breaks into your home, the court must assume that it was reasonable for you to believe you were in imminent danger. As a result, if an intruder forces their way into your home, your use of force, up to and including the use of deadly force in self-defense, will be given the benefit of the doubt unless contradictory evidence can be produced.
When is Self Defense Justified?
When you act in self defense, you have committed a violent crime, and you could be punished for it if you did so in a situation where you cannot claim self-defense. Some valid self-defense uses are obvious. If someone physically assaults you or someone else around you, you may use force to dissuade them from further violence or render them incapable of further violence, as necessary. Under the Castle Doctrine, uses of force against a home intruder are usually considered valid self-defense.
Outside of your home, you can generally only claim self-defense when you are acting to prevent the use or threat of violence. This means that you cannot use force to prevent larceny-theft[6], such as someone stealing a package from your porch. However, if someone commits robbery, this involves the use of force.
For example, when someone brandishes a weapon[7]at you or threatens to assault you if you do not hand over your possessions or vacate your vehicle. In these scenarios, the threat of violence creates a reason for you to believe that force is necessary to protect yourself from harm, which can justify your claim of self-defense.
What are the Elements of Self-Defense in California?
To successfully claim self-defense after using force against someone, you must prove that:
You reasonably believed yourself or someone else to be in imminent danger
You reasonably believed that using force was necessary to prevent harm
You did not use more force than was necessary to prevent harm
Proving these is not always straightforward, but violent crimes lawyers can help you make the best argument for your case.
Imminent Danger
Imminent danger means that there is a possibility of you or someone else being harmed, and it is happening right now. You cannot claim self-defense for an action you take pre-emptively.
For example, if someone brandishes a weapon and approaches you with it, there is an immediate threat. However, if someone threatens you with violence that will happen at a later point, such as by making a threatening phone call, you cannot use force in response to that threat alone.
You also cannot claim self-defense for an action you take in response to harm that has already occurred and is no longer happening. For example, if someone assaults you then you can defend yourself at the time, but you cannot seek them out later to attack them.
Reasonable Belief a Threat Exists
Your belief that there is a real threat can be reasonable even if the threat does not really exist. A jury will decide whether a reasonable person would have believed the danger was real if they had been in your position, with the information you had.
For example, if someone points a fake or unloaded gun at you, most people would assume that the gun is real and loaded. As a result, you had a reasonable belief that you were in imminent danger and needed to use force, even though your assumption was incorrect.
On the other hand, your belief that you are in danger can also be unreasonable. For example, if you are experiencing paranoid delusions or hallucinations you may feel that someone intends you harm, and respond with force. A reasonable person would not have believed that they were in any danger, so you cannot argue that you had a reasonable belief of the threat.
Justifiable Force
You cannot use a level of force that exceeds what is needed to stop a threat.For example, if someone shoves you, you may be justified in shoving them back to get them away from you. Responding to this assault by shooting or stabbing someone would likely be seen as an excessive force that was not needed to end the threat.
This is more complex than the initial level of violence or the type of weapon involved, however. There are many factors that can affect whether your use of force was justified.
Context matters: Your size, the aggressor’s behavior, or whether you’re defending someone else can influence what is considered proportionate. If you are outnumbered or physically outmatched, this can justify a reasonable belief that greater use of force was needed to prevent the threat. There can also be situations where a reasonable person might deem less force to be necessary, such as if you use self-defense against a minor.
What are the Limits of Self Defense?
You can only claim self-defense when you have used force to protect human life or protect a person from bodily harm such as assault, kidnapping, or sexual assault. In California, your use of force must be proportionate to the threat.
The legal right of self-defense ends when there is no longer an imminent danger. You must stop using force as soon as the threat has passed. For example, you cannot continue to hurt someone once they are restrained or unconscious, because they are not a danger to you anymore, regardless of what they did or attempted to do to you previously.
What is Imperfect Self Defense?
Imperfect self-defense means that your case does not have all three elements of a self-defense action; however, it has enough elements that you are partially excused for your crime. This can result in receiving a lesser charge, such as turning a murder charge[8] into a voluntary manslaughter charge, which carries a lighter sentence.
Can I Claim Self-Defense If I Hit Someone First?
You can claim self-defense even if you attacked first, but this places even more emphasis on the grey areas of whether your belief of danger was reasonable, and the use of force justified. For example, you could argue that someone bunched their fist and tensed as though they were going to punch you, so you acted to restrain them before they could do it.
If you have previously assaulted someone before leaving the scene and they later attack you, you can claim self-defense for using force to prevent their attack, even if you are found guilty of the initial assault.
Can you go to Jail for Self Defense in California?
Yes—if your actions fail to meet the legal requirements for self-defense or are considered “imperfect,” you can still be charged and convicted. If the jury finds that your actions were not self-defense, or were a case of imperfect self-defense, you can be convicted of a crime that carries a prison sentence. The highest charge you can be convicted of for imperfect self-defense is voluntary manslaughter, according to Penal Code 192[9], which can have a sentence of up to eleven years and a fine of up to $10,000.
Self-Defense Checklist
Before acting in self-defense, consider:
Is the threat happening right now?
Would others believe you’re in danger?
Is your response proportionate?
Has the threat stopped?
Have you been involved in a self-defense incident and need a Los Angeles criminal defense lawyer? Contact the best attorney in LA to ensure the best outcome for your case.
FAQ on California Self Defense Laws
Do I have to retreat in public?
No—California’s “stand your ground” applies anywhere you have a legal right to be
Can I protect my goods?
Yes—but only with non-lethal force. Deadly force for property alone is not justified.
Can I use force to defend my property?
Only non-lethal force is allowed to protect property. Deadly force is never justified solely for theft unless there's a threat to life.
Do I have to retreat first?
No—California does not require retreat if you're in a lawful location and face imminent harm.
Can I defend someone else?
Yes—but you must reasonably believe the other person was in imminent danger of harm.
Kardashian will face her biggest educational test yet in sitting the California state bar, which Manshoory says is “known as one of the most challenging bar exams in the country.”
Criminal law classifies crimes partly based on the defendant’s state of mind at the time of the offense. This division between specific intent crimes and general intent crimes changes how a case is handled, what defenses work, and how bad the punishment might be. Anyone facing charges needs to understand this difference.
Understanding Intent in Criminal Law
Criminal law looks at two main things: what someone did (actus reus) and what they were thinking (mens rea). California uses special jury instructions called CALCRIM[1] to explain this. Intent connects someone’s thoughts to their actions when committing a crime. It helps measure how blameworthy they are and affects both the charges they face and their sentence if convicted.
Criminal laws place intent into two main buckets: specific and general intent.
Specific Intent Crimes Explained
For prosecutors to win their case, they must prove two things: that the defendant did the act AND that they had a particular purpose in mind when doing it.
Check the law’s language. Words like “with intent to,” “knowingly,” or “willfully” mean prosecutors have to prove what the defendant was thinking, not just what they did.
Take burglary as an example[2]. Just proving someone entered a building unlawfully isn’t enough. Prosecutors must also show they entered specifically to commit theft or another felony once inside. Without that mental element, it’s not burglary.
Examples of Specific Intent Crimes
Burglary (PC 459): Unlawful entry PLUS intent to commit theft or a felony inside
Robbery[3] (PC 211): Taking property by force or fear, PLUS intent to permanently deprive the owner
Forgery (PC 470): Signing someone else’s nam,e PLUS intent to defraud
Other specific intent vs general intent distinctions appear in crimes such as theft[5], embezzlement, solicitation, conspiracy, and attempted crimes[6].
A criminal defense attorney sometimes uses the memory aid A-SPCF: Attempt crimes, Solicitation, Property felonies, Conspiracy, First-degree murder.
What are Defenses for Specific Intent Crimes?
When the law requires specific intent, these defenses can work:
Showing the prosecutor can’t prove the defendant’s state of mind
Evidence of intoxication that prevented the formation of the proper criminal intent
Mental illness that made forming specific intent crimes impossible
Defense strategy focuses on breaking the link between actions and mental state. Since prosecutors must prove both the act and the intent, creating doubt about either element of the crime can lead to acquittal.
What are General Intent Crimes?
General intent crimes only require proof that the defendant deliberately committed the act, regardless of what they intended to happen as a result.
Prosecutors just need to show that the defendant voluntarily did something against the law. Their reasons or goals don’t matter.
CALCRIM No. 250 covers these crimes, telling jurors to focus only on whether the defendant deliberately did the criminal act[8], not what they hoped would happen.
These offenses focus on the voluntary action rather than the purpose.
Examples of General Intent Crimes
Assault (PC 240)[9]: Just requires an intentional act causing fear of harmful contact
Battery (PC 242): Just requires intentional, harmful, or offensive touching
Rape: Focuses on doing the act without consent, not intent to harm
Many scholars note that specific intent vs general intent can be determined by examining the statutory language. Courts figure out which type applies based on the law’s wording and previous cases.
What are Defenses for General Intent Crimes?
Defending against these charges typically involves:
Proving a lack of voluntary action (unconsciousness, seizure)
Punishment: The former category often comes with harsher penalties
Prosecution Approach: For the more complex cases, prosecutors must prove the defendant’s purpose beyond just doing the act
Why Intent Knowledge Matters for Your Defense
Knowing whether you face specific intent crimes or general intent charges helps build the right defense. This distinction affects everything from evidence to sentencing. California courts keep refining these distinctions through their rulings. The specific intent crimes offer more defense options based on mental state. The general intent focuses mainly on whether the defendant voluntarily did the prohibited act.
If you or someone you know is facing criminal charges, intent matters; our experienced defense attorneys can assess your case and develop effective strategies based on specific intent requirements. Contact us today at (877) 511-7583 for a free consultation.
In criminal law, this defense holds true when someone acts under a false but reasonable belief, therefore influencing their mens rea¹. Whether the accused had the necessary intent to participate in illegal activity takes the front stage. Should the erroneous notion eliminate intent, a conviction could be denied. It is not like a Mistake of Law, though, since courts hardly consider ignorance of the law as a legitimate justification. Analyzing legal tactics in criminal cases depends on an awareness of this difference.
Explaining the Mistake of Fact Defense
Whether someone has criminal intent depends on their act occurring under an erroneous but reasonable assumption regarding a critical fact. This defense of error is applied in circumstances whereby the accused did not deliberatelycommit a crime.
For example, taking another person’s jacket by mistake while thinking it belongs to you lacks the intention of theft. Still, deliberately grabbing it even knowing it belongs to someone else is not allowed.
This case is more successful where conviction depends on establishing intention. When intent to act alone is enough for guilt, its effectiveness is limited. Some offenses do not allow this defense at all, as intent is not required for conviction.
The Role of the Mistake of Fact in Criminal Liability
In criminal law, the mental state² determineswhether an act was intentional or accidental. Many crimes call for proof of purpose, and this defense might refute that by demonstrating the accused lacks understanding of misconduct.
Taking an item while believing it belongs to you differs from knowingly stealing it. One involves an honest mistake, while the other demonstrates criminal intent.
Courts carefully assess fact or law distinctions³. A Mistake of Factcan excuse a crime by negating intent, but a Mistake of Law—claiming ignorance of the law—is rarely accepted. The key difference is whether the misunderstanding affects the ability to form criminal intent.
What is the Mistake of Law Defense?
This defense applies when a person commits a crime due to ignorance or misunderstanding of legal rules. Unlike other defenses that question intent, it argues that the defendant did not realize their actions were illegal.
Courts rarely accept this argument because individuals are expected to know the law. Not realizing that gambling is illegal in a certain state does not exempt someone from penalties. However, in rare cases, it may apply, such as when a government official provides incorrect legal advice that leads to unlawful actions.
In certain legal disputes, mistakes of law defensesare sometimes raised, but generally face strict limitations. Courts often require that the misunderstanding stem from official misinformation rather than personal ignorance of the law.
Do These Defenses Apply to Strict Liability Crimes?
Certain crimes do not require proof of intent; committing the act alone is enough for conviction. These offenses include statutory rape, selling alcohol to minors, and certain environmental violations.
Because mistake-of-fact defenses rely on negating intent, they are usually ineffective in these cases. A store owner who mistakenly sells alcohol to a minor using a fake ID⁴ is still liable—even if they genuinely believed the buyer was of legal age. Strict liability⁵ laws prioritize public safety over individual misunderstandings, making intent irrelevant in most cases.
Criteria for a Valid Mistake of Fact Defense
For this defense to be valid, the mistake must be both reasonable and bona fide (made in good faith). Courts consider whether a typical person in the same situation would have made the same honest mistake and whether it negates criminal intent.
A key factor is the type of crime involved. In specific intent crimes, where proving intent is necessary (e.g., theft or fraud), a mistake of fact can be a strong defense. If someone took another’s property genuinely believing it was theirs, they lacked the required intent for theft⁶.
However, in general intent crimes, where only the intent to act matters (e.g., assault), this defense is harder to use. Mistakenly striking another person under the belief they were an attacker may still lead to guilt, as the intent to strike existed, even if the reasoning was flawed.
Limitations and Challenges of the Mistake of Fact Defense
This defense does not apply when the misunderstanding is unreasonable or irrelevant to the crime. If a defendant’s belief was irrational or negligent, such as assuming an unlocked car was theirs without verifying ownership, the argument is unlikely to succeed.
One major challenge is proving that the mistake was reasonable and made in good faith. The prosecution may argue that the accused should have verified the facts before acting. Courts assess whether a reasonable person would have made the same error under similar circumstances.
Additionally, societal and legal perceptions influence how judges and juries interpret legal defenses in criminal cases. A mistaken belief that aligns with common sense is more likely to be accepted than one that appears reckless. This makes it critical for defendants to present strong evidence supporting their claims.
This defense plays a crucial role in cases where intent matters but comes with strict legal limitations. Successfully arguing it requires proving a reasonable and good-faith belief. However, courts carefully evaluate the circumstances, and a weak argument can lead to conviction.
Legal representation is essential in navigating a defense in criminal law cases. Our criminal defense attorneys at Manshoory Law can assess whether a defense of a mistake is applicable and build a strong case. Without proper legal guidance, defendants risk misinterpreting the law and facing severe penalties.
Consult a qualified lawyer today to build the strongest defense and secure the best possible outcome.
Many people search for the term “What is Bail Jumping?” but often struggle to find clear answers. To clarify, bail jumping is a serious legal issue defined as the failure of a defendant, who has been released on bail, to appear in court for a scheduled trial. In California, this act is treated with utmost seriousness and can lead to severe consequences that negatively impact the defendant’s legal status and may result in significant financial liabilities.
Understanding Bail in California
Bail consists[1] of money paid with the promise from the defendant that they will attend their trial. In this context, it permits accused persons to be out of remand while waiting for their hearing, and this helps in reducing their intrusions into their lives. In California, specifics of the amount of bail[2] are calculated in accordance with the type of crime, criminal record, and likelihood of a defendant’s escape.
How is Bail Determined?
Judges in California consider various elements when setting bail amounts. These include:
When a defendant is released on bail, they must adhere to specific conditions imposed by the court. These may include regular check-ins with a bail bondsman, restrictions on travel, and mandatory appearances at all scheduled court dates. Understanding these responsibilities is crucial; failure to comply can lead to bail jumping charges.
What is Bail Jumping?
Popularly known, it is legally classified under California Penal Code 1320 & 1320.5[4] and commonly referred to as failure to appear for court or simply skipping bail. This act is different from other related crimes, including violation of probation[5], refusal to observe a bailing condition, or being absent from a court hearing due to some circumstances beyond your control.
The Consequences of Failure to Appear in California
The closest consequence for any defendant who fails to appear in court is the bench warrant[6], issued for arrest. This warrant permits the arrest of the person without any delay in a civil matter.
If an offender continuously fails to respect the provisions of his bail, the consequences following the charge of bail jumping are very serious and long-lasting. It distorts the ongoing criminal trials and may also attract other charges that carry more severe consequences than others. Failure to appear can also impact a future legal situation in a way that a longer jail term or higher fines can be imposed.
Along with criminal charges of up to 4 years imprisonment and fines of up to $10,000 in instances where charges are felony[7], defendants who jump bail lose any properties or valuable items pledged to a bail bondsman. This loss is really felt and may impose a lot of stress not only on the defendant but also on his/her family members and relatives who may have guaranteed the amount paid for bail.
Legal Obligations and Rights After Missing a Court Date
If a defendant fails to appear in court, it is critical that they take immediate action. The first step should be reaching out to their attorney or legal counsel for guidance on how to rectify the situation before further legal action is initiated.
Surrender Voluntarily: If feasible, surrender voluntarily to law enforcement or the court.
File for Reinstatement: Work with your attorney to file necessary motions for reinstating bail[8]or rescheduling.
Legal counsel plays an essential role in managing these circumstances by advising defendants on potential defenses against bail jumping charges and assisting in rescheduling missed court dates.
Bail Jumping vs. Accidental Failure to Appear
It is essential to differentiate between willful bail jumping and unintentional failure to appear. Accidental failures may arise from circumstances beyond one’s control, such as medical emergencies, transportation issues or lack of proper notice regarding the court date, and can sometimes serve as valid defenses againstbail jumpingcharges. Understanding these distinctions can help defendants prepare an appropriate defense if charged with bail jumping.
The Process of Reinstating Bail or Rescheduling a Missed Court Appearance
To reinstate bail or reschedule a missed appearance, defendants should follow these steps:
Consult Your Attorney: Seek guidance from an experienced criminal defense attorney.
Surrender Voluntarily: If possible, voluntarily turn yourself in to law enforcement.
File Necessary Motions: Work with your attorney to file motions for reinstating your bail or obtaining a new court date.
Attend Rescheduled Hearing: Ensure attendance at any new court dates set by the judge.
By taking these steps promptly, defendants can mitigate some of the negative consequences associated with failing to appear.
Bail jumping is a major problem in California’s criminal justice system. By having some background information on what entails bail jumping, the consequences faced, and ways of dealing with the situation in case of missing court sessions, the defendant will be in a better position. If you or somebody dear to you has problems associated with bail jumping or has missed a court appearance, it is crucial to address this problem with qualified defense attorneys and legal aid that will help to solve it specifically.
If you need additional help or want to speak to an attorney about bail jumping or other matters, please contact us or call (877) 830-2348. Your rights deserve protection; let us help you navigate your path forward.
References
Manshoory Law Group, APC. (2022, January 19). How the bail system works in California | Manshoory Law. https://manshoorylaw.com/bail/
Manshoory Law Group, APC. (2021, December 6). Los Angeles Warrant Lawyer | Bench and Arrest Warrants Attorney | Manshoory Law. https://manshoorylaw.com/warrants/
The criminal justice system tackles questions of fairness, morality, and protecting rights. Many aspects contribute to such fairness, and one of the best-known is the Brady violation, which stems from the 1963 case of Brady v. Maryland.
A Brady violation happens during a trial when the prosecutor fails to disclose evidence that weakens their case, thereby implicating the defendant without trying to prove guilt.
Origins of the Brady Violation
The origins of the Brady violation concept come from the Supreme Court case of Brady v.Maryland in 1963[1]. In this case, John Brady was convicted of first-degree murder[2]. Later, during his defense, Brady’s legal team discovered that a crucial statement from a co-defendant had not been presented, which could have affected the trial’s outcome
The Supreme Court contended that the trial prosecutor is under an obligation to turn over all favorable evidence without exception. Suppression of crucial evidence cannot be used as grounds for conviction. This led to the development of the Brady violation concept, which has since evolved.
A crucial case that further solidified this framework was Kyles v.Whitley[3]. In this case, the Supreme Court reinforced the importance of prosecutorial disclosure[4]and ruled in favor of a defendant whose conviction had been affected by failure to disclose crucial evidence. This decision emphasized the obligation of trial prosecutors to ensure full transparency in criminal trials.
Legal Requirements of a Brady Violation
To establish a Brady violation in court, three key requirements must be met. These requirements form the foundation for any Brady claim and help courts determine whether a defendant’s due process rights have been violated. Let’s examine each requirement in detail to understand what prosecutors must disclose and what defendants must prove.
1. Favorable Evidence to the Defendant
The prosecution must have withheld favorable evidence that is either
Exculpatory Evidence – directly supports the innocence of the defendant
For instance, if a witness statement or DNA evidence[6]could have exonerated a defendant from wrongdoing, but the prosecution failed to disclose it, that would be Brady material.
2. The Prosecution Withheld the Evidence
The prosecution must have omitted the evidence disclosure to the defense. This occurs either:
Intentionally: The prosecution deliberately withholds evidence.
Unintentionally: Evidence is missed or not presented because of carelessness.
Regardless of purpose, the concealment of evidence that may influence the outcome of the trial is a Brady right.
3. The Suppressed Evidence Caused Prejudice
The defendant has to prove that the outcome of the trial would have been different if the evidence had been disclosed.
Here is an example:
If evidence under a key witness’s testimony was forged, and some records proved this, the defendant might argue that had these records been disclosed, they would have changed the verdict.
What is a Brady Motion?
A Brady motion is a motion in which the defense seeks from the court an order forcing the prosecution to release information, the nondisclosure of which relates to the Brady materials. The motion can be made either before the beginning of the trial, contemporaneously with the trial’s progress, or post-conviction.
What Counts as Brady Material?
Brady materials comprise all the evidence that could be beneficial to the accused, inclusive of evidence that may prove the defendant’s innocence and, on the other side, evidence that has the lowest level of incrimination against the accused or casts suspicion on the prosecution’s evidence against the accused.
These can include, but are not limited to, witness statements, photographs, or other evidential materials, as well as documents that can verify the arguments prepared by the defending side in the case.
For example, if a defendant claims he or she did not commit the crime, and there is evidence showing he or she did not, then that evidence will be considered Brady material.
Brady Disclosures: What Happens After a Brady Motion is Granted?
If a Brady motion is granted, the prosecution must disclose all relevant Brady materialto the defense. Failing to do so can result in serious legal consequences, such as:
Conviction reversal: If the withheld evidence is crucial, the court may vacate the conviction.
New trial orders: If the violation undermined the fairness of the original trial.
Sanctions against the prosecution: In severe cases, prosecutors may face disciplinary action.
Brady disclosures can occur before, during, or after trial, depending on when the evidence is discovered. Defense counselors must remain vigilant throughout the case to identify possible Brady violations and protect their client’s rights.
The Impact of Brady Violations on Criminal Defense
Brady violations have major consequences for defendants, prosecutors, and the legal system as a whole.
1. Legal Remedies for the Defendant
If a Brady violation is discovered, the defense lawyer can seek legal remedies such as:
Filing an appeal to challenge the conviction.
Requesting a retrial if the suppressed evidence was critical.
Prosecutors have an ethical duty[8] to ensure a fair trial by disclosing all Brady material. Failure to do so undermines public trust in the justice system. It can lead to misconduct charges against prosecutors. Plus, it may result in disciplinary actions, including disbarment in extreme cases.
3. Broader Justice System Implications
Brady violations highlight the risks of wrongful convictions, emphasizing the need for:
Better oversight of prosecutorial practices.
Stronger accountability measures for evidence disclosure.
Judicial enforcement of fair trial rights.
A Brady violation involves serious injustice in a case such that the outcomes can be mistakenly changed. Where one or more of your close family members, including you suspect critical evidence is not disclosed, legal representation is promptly needed. An experienced district attorney can check case details for potential Brady violations, file a Brady motion to obtain undisclosed evidence, and advocate for a retrial or appeal if a violation occurs.
Need Legal Guidance?
If you suspect that a Brady violation has impacted your case, contacting a defense attorney at Manshoory Law would be a better option for you.
We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. Agree
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
