Trusted Criminal Defense Attorneys In Southern California
I agree to receive promotional content and notifications from Manshoory Law Group through email or text message. For further details, kindly refer to our Privacy Policy.
In criminal proceedings, understanding the difference between a “No Contest” plea and a “Guilty” plea can have significant legal, personal, and strategic implications. These two serve distinct purposes, each carrying unique consequences for defendants.
The Concept of Pleading in Criminal Cases
Plea-taking[1] is considered one of the most important aspects of a given criminal proceeding since it has serious implications. A plea shows how a defendant goes about defending themselves when the charges have been laid against them, mostly determining the direction of the legal process. In criminal court, defendants typically have three primary options for entering a plea:
Guilty: Admitting guilt and accepting the legal consequences.
Not Guilty: Denying the charges and opting for a trial.
No Contest (nolo contendere): Neither admitting guilt nor contesting the charges but accepting the court’s penalty.
Every plea has its part to play within this system[2], determining whether a case goes to trial, sentencing, or the civil arena. Entitlement to a plea is highly selective, and in any given case, a legal practitioner should encourage it.
Understanding Guilty Plea in Criminal Cases
A guilty plea is when a defendant agrees with the allegations and the court by saying they are guilty of the crime charged. In doing so, the defendant accepts that they are guilty as charged and should bear the burden for what was done. This plea is usually applied when the defendant and his/her lawyer allow that there is nearly any breakage of winning the case within the courtroom.
Legal Implications of Pleading Guilty
When a defendant pleads guilty, several legal processes[3] are set into motion:
Admission of Guilt: The defendant openly admits they committed the crime and is foregoing a trial.
Progression to Sentencing: A guilty plea allows the court to skip the trial phase and move directly to sentencing.
Benefits and Drawbacks of a Guilty Plea
Benefits:
Plea Bargaining: Defendants may negotiate a reduced sentence or lesser charges through a plea bargain.
Efficiency: A guilty plea expedites the legal process, potentially reducing time and legal expenses.
Drawbacks:
Criminal Record: A guilty plea results in a conviction on the defendant’s criminal record[4], impacting future opportunities.
Potential for Maximum Penalties: The defendant is subject to the court’s full sentencing power.
By admitting guilt, defendants may resolve their cases quickly but must weigh the consequences of having a permanent mark on their record.
No Contest vs Guilty: Exploring a No Contest Plea
Nolo contendere or no contest plea permits a defendant to rely on the court’s judgment and accept punishment without admitting to the crime. Though, as mentioned earlier, it has the same consequences as a plea of guilty, it is not the same. It does not even require the defendant to state that they committed the crime; instead, a no-contest plea means the defendant is ready to be sentenced without admitting guilt.
Key Differences from a Guilty Plea
No Admission of Guilt: While a guilty plea means that the suspect acknowledges that he or she committed the crime, a no-contest plea is different. Rather, the defendant agrees with the court’s statement without arguing about the charges.
Civil Implications: This plea is particularly advantageous in cases where a civil lawsuit[5] may follow, as it cannot be used as evidence of liability in civil court.
Impact on Sentencing
The sentencing phase for a no-contest plea is similar to that of a guilty plea. However, defendants may mitigate certain long-term consequences by avoiding an explicit admission of guilt.
Guilty vs No Contest: How Pleas Affect Civil Court Cases
A significant distinction between these pleas lies in their implications for civil court proceedings:
Guilty Plea: An admission of guilt can be used as evidence in a related civil lawsuit, potentially increasing liability for damages.
No-Contest Plea: Since a no-contest plea does not constitute an admission of guilt, it can generally not be used as evidence in civil court.
For this reason, defendants facing potential civil claims often enter a no-contest plea to protect themselves from further legal exposure.
Comparative Analysis: No Contest vs Guilty
Here are the key differences between a no-contest plea and a guilty plea:
Admission of Guilt:
Guilty: Involves a direct admission of guilt.
No Contest: Does not admit guilt but accepts punishment.
Use in Civil Court:
Guilty: Can be used as evidence in civil lawsuits.
No Contest: Typically not admissible in civil proceedings.
Sentencing:
Guilty: Proceeds directly to sentencing based on the defendant’s admission of guilt.
No Contest: Similar sentencing process without formal admission.
Please refer to this table for better understanding:
Aspect
Guilty
No Contest
Admission of Guilt
Direct admission of guilt
No admission of guilt
Use in Civil Court
Can be used as evidence
Generally not admissible
Sentencing
Based on the Admission of guilt
Similar sentencing without admission
Strategic Considerations: Defendants should consider their particular circumstances, such as the possibility of civil litigation, the strength of the evidence against them, and possible plea bargains. Seeking a criminal defense attorney ensures prudent decision-making tailored to the case’s nuances.
Do You Always Have the Choice of What to Plead?
While defendants generally have the right to choose their plea, the court may impose certain restrictions. For example:
A judge’s discretionmay reject a no-contest plea in cases requiring an explicit admission of guilt.
Prosecutors may condition plea deals on the defendant entering a specific type of plea.
Working with a skilled criminal defense attorney ensures you navigate these complexities effectively and select the plea that best aligns with your legal strategy.
Choosing between a “No Contest” and “Guilty” plea is a very tough decision, which can significantly change the vantage point and circumstances of a defendant’s case in life to come with potential civil liabilities. While a guilty plea would mean efficiency and prospects of plea bargains, a no-contest plea can offer strategic protection against civil lawsuits. Each bears different benefits and risks for the parties involved and needs guidance from a seasoned defense attorney.
For professional legal assistance, contact Manshoory Law today. Our experienced defense lawyers are here to help you navigate your criminal charges and determine the best path forward.
Having a DUI arrest can be a terrifying experience, especially when your driver’s license hangs in the balance of judgment. Understanding the chances of winning a DMV hearing becomes crucial to anyone facing this challenging legal situation. For most people, navigating the administrative process is simply daunting, as they are unaware of those critical steps affecting their driving privileges.
What is a DMV DUI Hearing?
DMV DUI Hearing is held by the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) as part of the discovery process. It is important to know that a DMV hearing is not the same as a criminal court case. Unlike a criminal case[1], wherein fines, probation, and incarceration could be at risk, what matters here is whether you will retain your driver’s license or get one.
During a DMV DUI hearing, an administrator, not a judge, is in charge of the case. This hearing is less formal than a court trial, but it is still essential to be prepared, as the evidence presented will directly affect your driving privileges.
What Leads Up to a DMV Hearing?
After a DUI arrest, several important steps lead up to a DMV hearing. Below, we will explain them in detail:
License Confiscation and Issuance of a Temporary License: After your arrest, the officer will seize your driving license and give you a provisional license[2]. This only lasts for 30 days, after which it becomes effective. You can continue operating a car but would need to determine the following course of action. Basically, the license will have a suspension notice, which informs you that your right to drive might be suspended[3]unless you take any further action.
Notice of Suspension: The notice of suspension[4]is a formal warning that your privilege of usage on the highways is being jeopardized. This would technically activate theadministrative hearing process with the DMV, but it has nothing to do with any criminal court action you might receive. The notice will inform you that you have the right to request a hearing to contest the suspension, but it’s a call you must make to either pursue it or not.
10-Day Deadline to File for a Hearing: You will only have 10 days from the date of your arrest to file for a DMV hearing. If you fail to apply for a DMV hearing within this period, your license will automatically be suspended. In that case, acting without undue delay becomes an important matter if you don’t want the suspension of your driving privileges to occur.
DMV Hearing Scheduling: To appeal for a hearing, you are required to call the Department of Motor Vehicles DMV. You can do this by calling them or posting a letter by mail. You should also attach your name, driving license number, and every other necessary information. Following receiving and processing such a request, the DMV will devise a date for holding your hearing. A notice of this da9te shall be issued, and you shall have prior preparation for this.
Preparing for the Hearing: After you have confirmed the hearing date, preparing for that date is required. At this stage, you will collect evidence, identify possible witnesses[5], and remind yourself what occurred during your arrest. Otherwise, you could opt to hire an attorney who can take you through the administration and present your case.
Immediate License Reinstatement After Suspension
For first-time offenders, it is possible to reinstate your driver’s license on the same day it is suspended. This can be achieved by:
Filing SR-22 Insurance: This serves as proof of financial responsibility.
Installing an Ignition Interlock Device (IID): Once the Ignition Interlock Device (IID)[7] is installed, you can bypass the mandatory suspension period and regain full driving privileges.
This reinstatement pathway allows individuals to resume driving without interruption on the very day of the suspension.
California DMV Hearing Request: How To Schedule One?
If arrested for DUI in California, you only have 10 days after the date of arrest to request a DMV hearing. Failure to do so within the given timeframe would lead to the automatic suspension of your license.
Failing to request a California DMV hearingmeans you have lost the chance to contest your license suspension and must accept the DMV’s decision. Therefore, timing is important.
To set up a DMV DUI hearing, you can contact the DMV Driver Safety Office. The state requires some information you provide to start your request, such as your name, driver’s license number, and other relevant information.
Once scheduled, you will hear a date for when and where the hearing is scheduled. In such a case, your DUI case will be reviewed there.
Your Rights At A DMV Hearing For DUI
Even though a DMV DUI hearing is less formal than a criminal trial, your rights may make all the difference in how things end for you. At a minimum, you are entitled to:
Be represented by an attorney
Review all the evidence against you before the hearing
Have a chance to question witnesses-(including the arresting officer)
Testify on your own behalf
Present evidence, which would include testimonial evidence as well as opinion testimony by experts
Factors That Affect Your Chances of Winning DMV Hearing
Your chances of winning the hearing at the DMV over a DUI will depend on many factors, and every single one will be addressed during your hearing. Here are some points that could go in your favor:
You Were Not Driving: You can always claim, for example, that you were not driving.
This would mean no burden of proof would put you behind the steering wheel, working to your advantage.
Lack of Probable Cause for the Traffic Stop: The DMV hearing officer must have legal grounds to stop a vehicle. In such cases, if the police officer did not have probable cause—such as observing a traffic violation or reckless driving[8]—then the validity of the stop can be contested.
No Refusal Notification for a Chemical BAC Test: You should be advised of what will happen if you refuse to submit to a chemical BAC test[9]. If the officer does not explain this, it can be a significant point in your favor.
Your BAC Was Legal: If your BAC (Blood Alcohol Content) was below the legal limit of 0.08% when taken, that fact could be used to prevent the suspension of your license.
You Did Not Refuse a Chemical BAC Test: If you agreed to let them do a BAC test when they made the demand, you could argue that you cooperate with law enforcement, which might help mitigate the case against you.
Each of these factors may be important in determining the DMV hearing, and it is often advantageous to have some form of legal representation to help present your case effectively.
What Happens if I Lose the DMV DUI Hearing?
If you lose your DMV DUI hearing, your driver’s license will likely be suspended. The length of the suspension depends on whether this is your first offense or a repeat offense. Typically, first-time offenders face[10] a suspension that lasts about four months. During this time, you may be eligible for a limited license, which allows you to drive to and from work, school, and other necessary activities while you attend a DUI class.
What Happens If I Win My DMV Hearing For DUI?
If you win, your license will not be suspended and you can continue driving as usual. Remember, winning a DMV hearing does not equate to a win on the DUI charge. Nevertheless, you still must process through criminal court and face other penalties that will be imposed separately.
Role of Legal Representation in DMV Hearings
DUI hearings at the DMV can be complicated, so choosing an experienced lawyer would be beneficial. A DUI attorney can help organize the evidence and encourage witnesses to share their observations, particularly those familiar with your situation. They understand the complexities of DUI law and can develop strong arguments to support your case. This expertise can significantly influence your hearing outcome and help protect your rights throughout the process.
DMV DUI hearings can be difficult to win, but as long as you are prepared, informed, and supported, they are possible. A little knowledge of the procedure, a general awareness of rights, and some steps taken in advance to defend yourself can be all you need to escape unwanted criminal convictions.
Navigating the complexities of a DMV hearing is not easy, but an experienced DUI attorney can make all the difference in obtaining a good outcome. Remember, this is your one shot to be able to drive and live as you choose. Act, move, and attempt to put yourself in the best position to succeed. Get in touch with us now for a consultation and take the next step to secure your right to drive.
In California, a Civil Harassment Restraining Order (CHRO) is an order[1] meant to prevent an individual from harassment, stalking, or threats where the offending person is only an acquaintance. One of the most noticeable advantages of this kind of restraining order is the fact that it targets all those who consider themselves unsafe and hence have to take the legal route seeking protection against the threats. Specialization towards the comprehensiveness of civil harassment restraining orders brings forth the relevance of retraining orders.
What Is a Civil Harassment Restraining Order in California?
The Code and Annotated Laws of California through its section (CCP) 527.6(B)(2) states[2] the contents of a civil harassment restraining order example as ‘no threat in exchange for a civil harassment order.’ A CPO is extended to persons who are experiencing harassment and harassment is as defined taking someone’s fear away even through conduct that reaches out to that person.
Harassment as described in section 498 of the California Code of Civil Procedure (CCP)67(i) refers to [3]; engaging in some type of unlawful violence as well as credible threats of violence, or any course of conduct by any person performed willfully which annoys or harasses another person without any lawful justification.
Eligibility for a Civil Harassment Restraining Order
A civil harassment restraining order can be sought when a petitioner can demonstrate that he or she is subjected to harassment by someone with whom the petitioner does not have a close relationship, such as neighbors, acquaintances, or even a stranger. If, however, the person seeking the protection is someone with close personal ties to the alleged harasser-be it a husband or wife, brother or sister, etc.-then that person would have to prepare a domestic violence restraining order with the help of a domestic violence attorney as soon as possible.
The types of relationships that qualify for a civil harassment restraining order include:
Neighbors
Co-workers
Friends
Acquaintances
On the other hand, the types of relationships that don’t qualify for civil harassment restraining orders are the following:
Spouses
Ex-spouses
Individuals with whom one has dated
Family members
What Behavior Can Lead to a Civil Harassment Restraining Order?
Several behaviors can warrant the filing of a civil harassment restraining order. Examples include:
Stalking: The act of following or monitoring someone frequently without their consent.
Threats: Any form of written or spoken words that instill fear in the victim.
Rape is the actual or attempted touching done with the intention of causing physical harm.
Unwanted Contact: Constant communication through calls, texts, and other social media messages.
These acts will lead to a situation in which the victim will not feel safe and become fearful of the defendant and hence demand legal action.
Types of Civil Harassment Orders
There are primarily two civil harassment orders in California:
Temporary (Emergency) Restraining Orders: These orders protect you immediately. They are usually awarded ex parte [4], meaning you do not give your abuser notice of the proceedings, if you need immediate protection. The court may also grant the restraining order the same day that you make the request.
Permanent Restraining Orders: If, after a court hearing, the judge feels that there is sufficient evidence of harassment, then an order of restraining can be issued that can last for up to five years. This type of order provides permanent protection and may include specific conditions such as no contact with and distance from the victim.
How to File Harassment Charges?
To apply for a civil harassment restraining order follow the following procedures:
Gather Evidence: Try to gather all the relevant evidence you have regarding your case. This can include some form of text, emails, photos, or witnesses.
Preparation and Paperwork Forms: You are going to need to fill out the different court forms detailing your situation and why you believe that you require a restraining order. The primary forms include:
Request for Civil Harassment Restraining Order (Form CH-100)
File Your Forms with the Court: The forms you fill must be filed with the right court in your location.
Serve the Other Party: The other person is required to receive a copy of your application to be able to respond accordingly
Attend the Court Hearing: You appear before a judge with all evidence and witnesses that would be on your side in court.
Evidence is the heart of such cases, as it makes it evident that harassment has indeed occurred and proves justification for the need to be protected.
What to Do if You Have Been Wrongfully Accused of Civil Harassment?
If you find yourself wrongfully accused of civil harassment, it is essential to take immediate action:
Read Court Papers: Read any papers you receive due to this restraining order with care.
Prepare Your Self to be Defended: Gather testaments and proofs against the false accusation[5].
Attend Hearings: It is so crucial that you be present in all scheduled courts and present your case.
Legal Protection: Seek a criminal defense attorney who has experience dealing with such cases of civil harassment. They may be able to assist you more effectively within the legal system and give you a better chance at fighting yourself with false accusations.
A civil harassment restraining order is one of the important protective orders used in California for preventing unwanted harmful behaviors by other persons outside of personal relationships.
Knowing how these orders work- from eligibility criteria to types of behaviors warranting a filing, and the process included- will empower the victim to obtain justice and safety through effective means. If you feel harassed or wrongfully accused, consult with lawyers who can protect your rights during this stressful process.
Imagine you are at home enjoying a quiet evening with your partner. Suddenly, an argument erupts. You fall over in a fight, and in the course of the exchange, your partner deliberately shoves you. The shock of the impact leaves you with an ache of pain in your arm, a bruised hip, and a sense of being physically and emotionally violated.
This scenario, of a current or former intimate partner’s intentionally causing physical injury, whether temporary or lasting, falls under California Penal Code 273.5. This code recognizes the gravity of domestic violence and is designed to safeguard people from such destructive conduct. Beyond being a mere physical injury, it represents a violation that carries the possibility of legal ramifications.
Understanding the complex legal terminology concerning physical harm can be akin to maneuvering through an intricate maze of laws. This all-inclusive handbook strives to clarify the concept, examine the legal structure of California Penal Code Section 273.5, and provide vital insights, particularly in situations where one may be confronted with such allegations.
What is Corporal Injury? Legal Definition
It can be confusing to understand what is corporal injury. From a legal standpoint, however, it encompasses any physical damage caused to another individual through the application of force. Consider lacerations, broken bones, strained ligaments, and internal trauma – essentially, any bodily harm caused by illicit force.
Nonetheless, it is crucial to distinguish corporal injury from its adjacent legal concepts:
Assault refers[1] to the emphasis on the potential for causing harm, rather than solely on the actual act. For instance, if an individual raises a threatening fist, it is deemed assault, even if no physical contact is made, including assault with a deadly weapon.
Battery refers to the illicit physical contact with another individual, regardless of its minimal nature. This encompasses actions such as pushing, striking, or even disturbingly touching someone’s hair without their consent.
The main differentiation lies in the amalgamation of illegal force and subsequent physical damage. The act of forcefully pushing someone[2], causing them to fall and scrape their knee, would be classified as a corporal injury, whereas a push that merely disrupts their balance would not meet the criteria.
Legal Framework Surrounding Corporal Injury in California
In regards to corporal injury, California employs a well-balanced strategy, especially in cases involving domestic battery. PC 273.5[3] specifically targets this matter, introducing an additional dimension to the legal structure.
Categorization: In contrast to certain jurisdictions, California organizes corporal injury by considering the level of harm and the surrounding conditions. A minor bruise devoid of any long-term consequences could be classified as a misdemeanor, whereas a fractured bone or internal injury may elevate it to a felony.
Burden of Proof: The requirement for the prosecution to establish is not that the victim experienced apprehension of force, but rather to show that force was indeed employed and resulted in physical injury. Consequently, this transfers the responsibility of proving innocence, underscoring the importance of comprehending one’s legal entitlements and plausible defense tactics.
Consequences and Legal Penalties for Corporal Injury to Spouse
Corporal injury to a spouse, which means inflicting physical harm upon a spouse or intimate partner, results in substantial legal and personal repercussions.
Legal ramifications: The possible outcomes of corporal injury to a spouse have significant scope, especially if the physical injury resulted in a traumatic condition. Monetary fines can span from several hundred to several thousand dollars, accompanied by varying prison terms that range from months to years, contingent on the gravity of the situation. Additional legal consequences may include probation, a protective order for domestic violence offenses, and mandatory counseling, further compounding the repercussions.
Long-Term Consequences: The repercussions extend beyond just legal ramifications in a domestic violence case[4]. Having a criminal history or prior convictions can have enduring implications, impacting prospects for future employment[5], choices in housing, and even custody battles concerning children. The emotional distress and societal disapproval of such charges may persist long after the legal process ends.
Defending Against Corporal Injury Charges – PC 273.5
If you are confronted with allegations under PC 273.5, it is important to understand that there are various defense options available to you. Presented below are a few potential tactics that can be considered:
Self-defense: In matters of self-defense[6], employing force to protect oneself or others can potentially serve as a legitimate defense. Nevertheless, the responsibility rests upon you to substantiate that it was a justifiable reaction to the imminent danger.
Unintentional incident: Establishing the absence of intent through reliable evidence is essential in determining the integrity of the injury. It’s important to note that the lack of intention does not automatically absolve one from responsibility for causing harm.
Insufficient evidence: When the prosecution’s case lacks substantial proof, whether in the form of physical force evidence or witness statements, it can undermine their argument. Seeking guidance from legal counsel can assist in uncovering inconsistencies and constructing a robust defense grounded in factual substantiation.
Witness testimonies: Collecting witness testimonies can be of immense value, as they have the potential to validate your account of the events and provide insights into the context surrounding the incident.
Nevertheless, it is imperative to obtain legal advice from a reputable Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney. These professionals possess the necessary knowledge, tools, and practical understanding to maneuver the complexities of legal regulations, gather evidence, construct a robust defense plan, and advocate for your interests proficiently in the courtroom.
To Conclude: Seeking assistance and acquiring information
Having a grasp of what is corporal injury provides you with information, however, it is important to note that this manual cannot serve as a substitute for individualized legal counsel. Each case has its own distinct characteristics, and seeking guidance from a qualified lawyer is crucial in order to receive customized advice and ensure effective legal advocacy.
If you or an acquaintance are confronted with accusations, including false accusations pertaining to physical harm, feel free to contact us to promptly seek assistance from a legal professional.
References
Manshoory, S. (2023, September 20). What is the difference between assault & aggravated assault | Manshoory Law. Manshoory Law Group, APC. https://manshoorylaw.com/blog/what-is-the-difference-between-a-simple-assault-and-an-aggravated-assault-in-california/
Although the terms robbery and theft are interchangeable in common language, they are two different types of criminal activities in law. Both of these acts involve taking someone else’s property without their consent. The difference in this case is that one consists of using force or threat and having a victim present during the crime being committed.
These are important distinctions to make for professionals in the legal field and the public simply because these crimes will be handled differently when it comes time to report, prosecute, and punish them.
In this blog, we will explain the elements of robbery vs theft, explain their legal consequences, and define the difference between burglar and robber.
Theft Defined
Theft, in law, is a general term covering a variety of specific types of stealing including the crimes of larceny[1], robbery, and burglary.
In legal terms, theft is when someone takes something that doesn’t belong to them without the owner’s permission and with the intention of keeping it permanently.
The thief doesn’t have to want to keep the stolen property for themselves; intending to sell, destroy, or abandon it where it won’t be found is enough.
For instance, when a car is stolen, it’s often sold or dismantled for parts. Sometimes, the intention to temporarily deprive the owner of the property is also enough, like when a car is stolen for a joyride and then abandoned where the owner can find it.
Key Elements of Theft:
As per Section 1 of the Theft Act 1968, the legal definition of theft is[2] – a person commits theft if he intentionally/ dishonestly appropriates property that belongs to another person. This definition can consist of the following types of theft:
Dishonesty: The essential requirement for theft is that the person must have acted dishonestly. This implies that they must have been aware that taking the property was wrong and that they did it to keep it for themselves.
Additionally, the property must have been taken without the owner’s consent. In other words, if the owner gave permission for the property to be taken, it cannot be considered theft.
Taking:The next requirement is that the individual must have taken possession of the property. This contains physical taking as well as situations where the person has control over the property, such as in cases involving fraud or deception.
Property: The property that is taken must belong to another person. This can involve any type of property whether it is commercial or residential including money, goods, and even pets.
Intent To Permanently Deprive The Owner Of It: The mental state of the person committing the theft is important. They must intend to keep the property for themselves or prevent the rightful owner from getting it back. This is what sets theft apart from borrowing or accidentally taking something.
Define Robbery
Robbery, a crime that has its roots in common law[3] , is the act of unlawfully taking someone else’s property through violent force or the threat of force, to permanently deprive them of it.
This involves the use of force or the threat of force, it is considered more serious than other theft crimes, like larceny, for example, which do not involve force.
Well, the main difference between robbery vs. theft is the use of force or intimidation in the act of taking property directly from someone.
The elements of the crime of robbery generally include:
taking someone else’s property from their person or in their presence
using violent force or the threat of force
and having the intention of permanently depriving them of their property
Legal Consequences: Theft vs Robbery
Penalties for Theft
The legal consequences for a person convicted of theft differ based on the jurisdiction and the details of the crime, especially the value of the stolen property.
Theft is usually classified into different levels depending on the value of the property taken, with penalties ranging from small fines to significant prison sentences.
Legal Consequences And Impact On The Severity Of The Penalties:
Petty Theft: This usually involves property valued below a certain threshold (e.g., $1000 in California). It is often classified as a misdemeanor, punishable by fines, community service, or imprisonment for up to one year.
Grand Theft: Involves property exceeding a specified value (e.g., more than $950 in California) and can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony.
Felony grand theft can result in significant prison time, often ranging from 16 months to three years or more, depending on the state and the specifics of the case.
Federal Theft Law: According to 18 U.S. Code § 641[4] , a federal law that prohibits the theft, embezzlement, or unlawful conversion of U.S. government property. It also criminalizes receiving, concealing, or retaining such property with the knowledge that it was stolen.
Penalties vary based on the property’s value: If it exceeds $1,000, the offender can face up to ten years in prison, while theft of lesser value can result in up to one year in prison. The law is designed to protect government property from unauthorized use or theft.
Aggravating and Mitigating Factors:
Aggravating Factors: Factors that can increase the severity of the penalty include the use of force, theft involving vulnerable victims (e.g., the elderly), prior criminal history, or theft of essential items (e.g., a vehicle or medical supplies).
Mitigating Factors: These can include the absence of a prior criminal record[5] , the return of stolen property, or cooperation with law enforcement. Mitigating factors may lead to reduced charges or lighter sentencing.
Penalties for Robbery
Robbery is a harsh crime that entails employing force, intimating, or threatening the victim into giving up his property. Unlike theft, which may occur without the victim’s immediate presence, robbery directly endangers the victim, making it a more severe offense in the eyes of the law.
California Penal Code Section 211[6]: Defines robbery as the taking of personal property from another person through force or fear, classifying it as a violent crime[7] The statute underscores the seriousness of robbery due to the threat or use of force.
Federal Law: 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act)[8] – The Hobbs Act, is a federal law that prohibits robbery or extortion of any substance whatsoever in interstate commerce (with somewhat challenging ways for Congress to prove those cases). This statute covers a robbery that carries with it up to 20 years in federal prison (with extra penalties if there are firearms).
California Penal Code Section 213: This law defines the penalties for robbery in California. According to this law:
First-Degree Robbery: In California, first-degree robbery can occur in specific situations, such as when the victim is a driver or passenger in a vehicle, when the crime takes place in an inhabited dwelling (like a house or apartment), or when the victim has just used an ATM. The penalty for first-degree robbery can include imprisonment in a California state prison for three, six, or nine years.
Second-Degree Robbery: Any robbery that does not meet the criteria for first-degree robbery is considered second-degree robbery. The penalty for second-degree robbery includes imprisonment in state prison for two, three, or five years.
What Are the Key Differences Between Theft and Robbery?
Robbery and theft differ in several respects, but the main difference that makes robbery the more serious offense is the potential for physical harm to a victim.
Person vs. property offense: Theft is a crime against property, while robbery is a crime against a person, making robbery more serious.
Theft involves taking or attempting to take money or property without using violence. On the other hand, robbery involves using force or the threat of force.
Victim presence: This is the main difference between robbery and theft. Robbery, unlike theft, entails taking property directly from or in the presence of a person, which places the victim in the path of direct harm.
Penalties: The penalties for theft and robbery reflect the potential for physical harm and violence to a victim. Robberies generally start as felonies, and a defendant convicted of robbery will likely face prison time. On the other hand, thefts can result in misdemeanor penalties. Even for felony theft, a person may potentially receive felony probation[9] and spend little time behind bars.
Theft vs Robbery: How do they Differ from Burglary?
While theft and robbery both involve unlawfully taking someone’s personal property, burglary is a different type[10] of crime altogether. The main distinction lies in how these crimes are committed.
Theft is the act of taking property with the intent to commit to permanently deprive the owner, without any direct interaction with the victim.
Robbery, however, involves force or the threat of force against the victim during the crime, making it more severe.
On the other hand, burglary involves unlawfully entering a building or structurewith the intent to commit theft or another felony inside. Unlike robbery, burglary doesn’t require the presence of a victim, nor does it involve the use of force against a person. The key factor is the unlawful entry, coupled with the intention to commit a crime once inside.
All in all, theft and robbery focus on taking property, and burglary is centered around illegal entry into a space with criminal intent, regardless of whether the intended crime is actually carried out.
Knowing the distinctions between robbery and theft is crucial for legal professionals and the general public alike. While both crimes involve unlawfully taking someone’s property, robbery is considered more severe due to the use of force and direct threat to victims.
This difference is reflected in the criminal charges and potential sentences for each offense. By recognizing these differences, we can better understand the legal system’s approach to property crimes and the varying degrees of severity of criminal acts.
If you or someone you know is facing charges related to theft, robbery, or burglary, it’s important to seek legal assistance. Contact us today for expert advice and representation to ensure your rights are protected.
Parker, D. (2023, November 14). Felony probation in California: How does felony probation work ? Manshoory Law Group, APC. https://manshoorylaw.com/blog/felony-probation/
Parker, D. (2024, August 13). Second degree burglary: The difference between first and second degree burglary in California | Manshoory Law Group, APC. Manshoory Law Group, APC. https://manshoorylaw.com/blog/second-degree-burglary/
We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. Agree
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
